BlackbootJacks

What goes around

2012-01-01T16:35:00.001-08:00

Well, well...take a look at this.

It seems one anti-jihadi site just bit the dust. That's very strange indeed, giving the age of the web site. Bare Naked Islam has been around for quite some time, and Wordpress just discovered it violates "terms of service"?

That sounds a little fishy to me. Maybe the Islamists Coalition for the Silencing of America has gotten a victory? Could be....

Of course there is no coalition, at least not yet, but I'm sure the Islamists are dancing for joy to see one major site is now down. I'll be willing to bet you a dozen donuts and a coffee, that this won't be the only site to "sleep wit da fishes".

To be perfectly honest with you, I have no sympathy with the owners of this site. Why? You may ask? Well, I'll tell you.

It really isn't anything big, but actually something very minute. But it was enough to turn me off of the site forever. And all I wanted to do was to swap links. That's it, just swap our site addresses.

I sent in a very nice and complimentary e-mail to the web master of Bare Naked Islam praising how superb the web site is maintained. I always have to lavish a site with compliments before I dump the request on them. After the praises I suggest BNI swap links with the ITF.....should be a no brainer now....right?

Wrong!

The webmaster comes back the next day and tells me..."Thank you for the very nice compliment. I appreciate that, but I really don't need to place more links on my site that contain the same subject matter as what I already have."

What? What did she say? "same subject matter"??? Now where I come from, I always believed that if we stood together we have a better chance for victory. Strength in numbers and all of that. I can see if I ran a porno web site that she can reject us, but we don't. The ITF is anti-jihad just like BNI and a thousand others. I wish more web site owners would come to me and ask to swap links.

I touched on this subject a couple of months back, when I had to deal with a snippy web site. It seems the swelling of an owners head grows in tandem with the popularity of ones web site. The bigger the site, the bigger the ego. At risk of pissing off some of the large site owners, I won't mention their names.

I hope my head never swells that large where I tell some smaller site to "get lost". If I ever do.....its time to quit. In the meantime I will enjoy our relationship with some of the best anti-jihadi web sites on the net. 1389, Blazing Cat Fur, Tundra Tabloids, The Jawa Report, Women Against Shariah and many many others. I can't list them all here, but they are all important, informative and very professional sites.

So sleep tight Bare Naked Islam. Give me a call when you get started up again. Maybe....we can do lunch. Or...maybe we can swap links.

A letter from a very intelligent man

2012-01-01T16:26:00.000-08:00

From: "0000"
To:
Subject: Re: Fw: Love it.......
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2012

Hello Jim,

I was away for a bit and may be heading back up north again. I will know more next week.

I haven't been writing much lately, not for lack of material but rather time and inspiration or the shortage of the same.

I have had a great deal to think about with respect to the efficacy of my writing and blogs in general. I am concerned that we are losing the war of giving proper exposure to the advances of islam and muslims.

I am at a crossroads so to speak.

I am convinced of the need for blogs and bloggers and the exposure they bring to the table of debate regarding islam and the fight against the same. Each of us brings to the fight a skill set which is a reflection of ability, opportunity, time, financial limitations, motivation and talent. To not partake in the fight against islam and muslims with whatever is at your disposal is to further their agenda and final solutions. So regardless of the significance of the contribution, significance being largely subjective in its quantification, at least they make one.

That said, there is an incredible amount of ignorance out there amongst the public with respect to islam and sharia. The corrosive effect of this ignorance is made exponentially greater by the apathy that goes hand and hand with it. As far as blogs are concerned, most people are completely unaware of them save for those of us who use the internet and or are knee deep in counterjihad.

So the questions loom large.........

What to do?.

Is blogging, aside from the effect it has amongst a small community and occasional hot potatoes and politically influential revelations, largely an exercise in self gratification.....simply literary masturbation?

Is anything to be done?

How to defeat this ignorance and apathy?

Is the battle already lost?

Are the people we fight for worth the fight and the sacrifice?

It is these sorts of questions I have been asking myself as of late, questions for which I am still seeking answers.

On a side note, relating to something I have noticed repeatedly, certainly one of the greatest impediments to success is the capricious arrogance and egotistical fawning that is a reflection of some of the bloggers personalities. Many of them, having enjoyed marginal success, consider themselves something of a celebrity, placing the message in a subordinate position to their reputations and egos. For many of these men and women there appears to be something of a "club" to join where newcomers are left standing outside with hats in hand....rather silly when you think about it......but then I've never been a fan of clubs.

I am also very unimpressed with the need or desire for anonymity of bloggers. As far as I'm concerned this hiding simply reinforces the resolve of the islamists. I don't recommend revealing addresses and telephone numbers but cowering in a corner is neither my style nor is it conducive to the open confrontation required to put islam and muslims in their place.........back to Africa and the Middle East.

There is also a bizarre side to some of the bloggers. I recall one blog I had posted quite a few pieces to that when, for reasons relating to the efficacy of the blog, I pulled my posts and stopped contributing to it, went on a smear campaign. She sent out a mass email to many of the blogs complaining about me and my lack of patience etc etc etc....I was a little surprised at that one.

So, to answer your question about BNI and her refusal to link to your blog I would just ignore it. She is entitled to make that call regardless of how you feel. Personally, I would have not placed your explanation about her refusal to link on your blog....in all honesty Jim.....and this may sting a little....it makes you look petty and childish. I would pull the piece......if it makes you feel better, I have written quite a few articles and have, on occasion, sent BNI an email....I have never received a response.....I could care less.

I think simply looking at the very professional and well written blogs like Jihadwatch and Atlas Shrugs as well of the many educational and informative blogs is the best example for a blogging model to emulate. Maybe that will answer your question. Personally I think your blog is very well done and is a needed contribution to the fight against islam....I would spend your time on Infidel Task Force and not worry about others.

So, to sum up.....I am not sure where I am going to turn with respect to the future......time will tell.

But I wanted to wish you and yours a belated Merry Christmas and hope that this New Year will find you surrounded by those you love and those who love you. I trust you are standing on the edge of a year that will be filled with good fortune and good health.

In closing...don't worry...I am not bowing out.....just rethinking strategy.

Regards, Don Laird
Edson, Alberta, Canada

There ain't nothin' wrong with our site!!

2011-12-29T14:23:00.000-08:00

I'm not one to be a cry baby, but something such as this...well, it just bothers the crap out of me. I am a firm believer that our site is a pretty good one. Good resources. Up to date information. Great participation from our staff. News and commentaries. Then out of the blue we get a guy that thinks he can decide which site is just ok, and which are "highly developed."

I was on Infidels United the other day and this member was lsiting web sites to go too. I threw ours in just to be funny and he comes back with this:

" Great work for those who have the time to scroll through it all. Can it be redone to be placed in categories? It's not bad but I'm going to try to limit my list to the higher developed sites, or at least I think I am. All I know is that I appreciate your great effort & what you're doing to alert and educate about Islam. "

I guess he didn't see the menu which "categorized" different Islamic Subject matter. He must have liked it because he said......"not bad". Ooooh.....not bad. But I guess we are not of the "higher developed" sites. Oh darn.

I responded with:

" The ITF gets a pretty decent hit count.
we have a nice size following. Tons of information and resources for people who are serious in fighting the threat of radical Islam. Unlike other sites, ours is not run by the size of our egos.
I don't appreciate the comment .."higher developed sites."
We at the ITF are very proud of what we produce. "

I think he means well, and I'm sure it was his first time visiting the ITF, so he is not familiar with our "rich content". How is that for a description? "Rich Content" If he was a regular visitor, I'm sure he would have a different opinion, but maybe I should see his site just to be sure. Problem is, I don't know the path.

Listen....what I'm trying to get at is if your going to produce a list of the Anti-Radical Islamic sites. Don't pick and choose. We are all in this together. Some sites are better maintained and others aren't. Some are done by one person, others have teams. Some sites are well known and MANY others are not.

I discover new sites everyday.

But...EVERY site is important! There are no little sites that do nothing. If some have no comments on their threads, we should help them. Get the word out!! Publicize all the web sites. Granted Atlas Shrugs and Jihad Watch and Bare Naked Islam and some others like to think of themselves as GODS and Goddesses of the bandwith, but they have also let the sites grow as big as their swelled heads. They truly want to educate the masses.....but they are looking out for their own hit counts as well, believe me.

The Infidel Task Force is in partnership with some GREAT sites well known to everyone. Sites like...Blazing Cat Fur and Tundra Tabloids and 1389. I can't list them all here so take a look at our blog list. Those sites came through and teamed with us when we were young and just starting. And they are with us still. Those sites and others, send us a lot of readers. And we are grateful to them.

All I'm asking is that one does not categorize sites or presume they are small and unworthy of mention. There is a deadly threat out there willing to kill and conquer us. We are all in this together, and the sooner we all realize that, the better.

Oooooo....lets not offend the muslims

2011-12-10T09:06:00.000-08:00

Let's Not “Offend” the Muslims*
1) capitolcommentary.com › Featured
May 4, 2011 – If some Muslims want to get upset and behead a few people because ... We do not mean to suggest that all Muslims loved bin Laden or that all ...
Upset by Ellison's criticisms, Bradlee Dean says Muslim Democrat ...
2) minnesotaindependent.com/82355/bradlee-dean-keith-ellison-sharia
Jun 6, 2011 – Upset by Ellison's criticisms, Bradlee Dean says Muslim Democrat wants to overthrow ... What is it you don't like about who we are Keith? ...
Toy store goes PC mad with pig ban | The Sun |News
3) www.thesun.co.uk/sol/.../Toy-store-goes-PC-mad-with-pig-ban.html
Nov 16, 2010 – Muslims, Jews, Christian Seventh-Day Adventists and Rastafarians all consider pork taboo. ... a kids' toy farm set — in case it upset Muslim and Jewish parents. ... Fellow Muslim mum Natasha added: "If you don't want your kid ...
Muslim cabbies upset with being forced to advertise strip clubs ...
4) www.nerve.com/.../muslim-cabbies-upset-with-being-forced-to-adver...
Jul 22, 2011 – Muslim cabbies upset about being forced to advertise strip clubs. ... If you don't want to wear hot pants and tight tops, don't apply for a job at ...
American Muslims upset over FBI 'trap' techniques (24Dec10 ...

5) www.youtube.com/watch?v=-EHnsibS-JwDec 24, 2010 - 3 min - Uploaded by liarpoliticians
American Muslims are upset that they feel the FBI are targeting then ... My message to muslims is.. integrate of emigrate ...
More videos for dont want to upset the muslims »
Muslims Upset Over 9-11 Coloring Book : News, Opinion, Truth ...
6) pushbacknow.net/2011/08/.../muslims-upset-ove-9-11-coloring-book...
Aug 31, 2011 – And why would atheist attend a religious meeting when they don't even believe in God…and do we really want to be part of the Islamic faith? ...
Islam in Europe: Scotland: Muslims upset about dog in police advert
7) islamineurope.blogspot.com/.../scotland-muslims-upset-about-dog-in...
Jul 1, 2008 – The advert has upset Muslims because dogs are considered ritually ... The Police should have made a public statement: Muslims don't like ...

Just for laughs I typed in "Lets not upset the muslims" in the Google search field. These links are what I came up with. Take a look at the varied subjects that seem to get the muslims riled...toy pigs, dogs, signs. But also notice that we censor ourselves. And thus we fall right into their hands.

I had breakfast the other morning with my cousin, who happens to be a teacher in the local school. I was astounded to learn that American traditional holidays are being re-vamped or removed out of the school system. The Board of Education is taking steps so as not to offend any one religion. It doesn't matter that no one has ever complained, they want to step right up and prevent it from ever happening.

The more I listened the more I understood that it wasn't just political correctness but also the removal of anything known as or displayed as Christianity from the holiday scene. Oh yes...you could have a menorah, but not the nativity.

This reminded me of the principal in a Massachusetts grammer school that singled handedly eliminated Columbus Day (because of the atrocities that Columbus may have done to the native population), cancelled Halloween (because of the relation to witchcraft and sorcery) and she may or may not cancel Thanksgiving Day decorations. (She hadn't decided yet) This is ONE person. Not a board or committee. One person to make these decisions. She has the power to control what those children think, learn and do in that school. And you as a parent do nothing. Time to stop that shit.

....but back to not offending the muslims.....

I am willing to wager that when the muslims reach a majority in any given town, city or state, you will see the leaders bending over backwards to let them do whatever they wish. After all we don't want any violence, now do we? We don't want them offended. Heavens no!! It would ruin our image as a country and citizenry of compassionate people.

Here's another.....in most schools around the country...the atrocity of 9/11 is not even being taught. GASP!! if you have school age children, just ask them how is the Radical Islamic attack of 911 presented. You may be very surprised at what you hear.

So maybe our gutless, gullible, political corrected liberal, progressive, spineless leaders are taking us down the road where we will no longer have any American traditions, thus lighting the way for the multi-cultural ideologies invading this country.

No maybes about it. Our children will suffer for what these fools are doing.

Blazing Cat Fur: Islamic Ritual Prayer Conducted At Toronto District School Board Middle School

2011-06-29T16:13:00.000-07:00

Blazing Cat Fur: Islamic Ritual Prayer Conducted At Toronto District School Board Middle School: "m"

Pakistan - I spit on you!!

2011-01-22T08:46:00.000-08:00

Yeah I'm mad...... Pakistan: I spit on you!! I can only hope that something God awful happens to that country and its uneducated ignorant people. The leaders are idiots and the clerics run the country. How can people like these condone violence against non-muslims? But they do!! I can honestly say, reading articles like this make me wish someone would line those Islamic clerics up against a wall and blow their brain matter out. What little they have. I demand to know how much money is sent to Pakistan, because I would demand that money stop. Let the Taliban come down and take over. So what!! If that is what they want....give it to them. Give them the submission that Allah demands. Let them have their 7th century ways, I don't care.

"Islam is Pakistan’s sole identity and there is no room for secularism and its believers in this country, deputy Secretary General, Jama’at-e-Islami Hafiz Sajid Anwar said here while addressing the Friday congregation at Mansoora mosque.
He said a Muslim could not tolerate blasphemy of the Holy Prophet (PBUH) and even the Interior Minister Rehman Malik had told media that if someone committed blasphemy in his presence, he would shoot him to death."

"If someone committed blasphemy in his presence he would shoot them to death." That's how they think. Allah before life. Death before dishonor to Allah. Allah before your children. Honor before family. Muslims are bad enough...male muslims are total idiots. Pakistani male muslims should be locked up.

"Hafiz Sajid Anwar exhorted the rulers to learn a lesson from Salmaan Taseer’s murder as none of the official Khatibs and Imams was ready to lead his funeral prayer. He said there was consensus of the Ummah that blasphemy of the Holy Prophet (PBUH) was punishable by death."

There!! Now you can see it. Blasphemy of the "holy prophet" is punishable by death. Well then hows this: "Allah is Satan. Mohammed was a rapist and pedophile. Allah is deaf, dumb and blind and he's probably a village idiot. ...and....and...oh yeah...Islam is of the devil."

Please send that to your buddies in Paki-terror-stan and give them my regards. Now I have one more quote;

"Addressing the Friday congregation at Syed Maudoodi Institute mosque Hafiz Muhammad Idrees said Salmaan Taseer’s murder should be an eye opener for the other rulers who were clamouring against the Blasphemy Law. Referring to Rehman Malik’s statement that he would shoot down a blasphemer, he asked what crime Mumtaz Qadri had committed. He said the protection of the minorities in the country also lay in obedience to the law of the country. He said that Islam guaranteed protection of the minorities. (Yeah RIGHT!! Thats why Christian Copts are being killed everyday. Islam protects no one except the muslim man. Everyone else suffers. Don't lie to us cleric.)He advised the anti-Islam elements in the country to stop attacks on Islam and study it thoroughly. He said that the western powers could cow down the Muslim rulers but not the Muslim masses."

Look idiot...the current western powers may bow down before muslims rulers...but if you let the western masses loose we will show you just how much we are capable of. DON'T .. and I really mean...DON'T try our patience. We can change the clueless and castrated politician we have now. So that the next ones will have some courage to go up against Islamic idiots such as yourself. So don't screw around with the American people.

Stop all financial aide to Pakistan...NOW!

.......there! I feel better now. You? - BBJ

Interview with Dr. Laina Farhat-Holzman

2011-01-22T08:43:00.000-08:00

Dr. Laina Farhat-Holzman is a writer and historian who formerly taught World History and Islamic Civilization at Golden Gate University in San Francisco, where she was also Executive Director of the San Francisco United Nations Association and was a frequent speaker for the World Affairs Council and the Commonwealth Club.

She has been a 26-year observer of the Islamic Revolution in Iran and has been charting the growth of fanatical radicalized Islam around the world. Both as a columnist for local newspapers and in scholarly papers given at academic conferences and published in the Comparative Civilizations Review, she has warned of the danger to democratic societies from a rising tide of fundamentalist/political religions.

The September 11, 2001 attack on America has increased the demand for her columns and as a lecturer. A book completed just before the attack, God's Law or Man's Law: The Fundamentalist Challenge to Secular Rule, has been published, and is going into its second edition.

Dr. Farhat-Holzman has lived in Iran twice: the first time when married to an Iranian student who was doing his graduate research in his home country. She was witness to Iran's accelerated attempt at modernizing during the reign of the last Pahlavi shah.

Her second residence there was fifteen years later, during the period leading up to the Islamic Revolution. She was the cross-cultural expert on a project that involved a number of US defense firms, US intelligence agencies, and the Iranian Air Force. Her perspective on radicalized Islam is a combination of domestic experience, professional experience, and her background as a historian.

May we present...

Dr. Laina Farhat-Holzman

ITF:

Welcome Dr Farhat-Holzman to the Infidel Task Force and thank you for taking the time to chat with us. You come with major credentials and I’m sure the readers will enjoy this column

Dr. Farhat-Holzman:

I am delighted to have found you—and been found by you!

ITF:

When someone hears about a woman living in Iran, the images that immediately spring to mind are of Sally Field in the movie: “Not Without My Daughter”. Tell us please how you were introduced to Iran.

Dr. Farhat-Holzman:

I met my Iranian husband at UCLA, and in graduate school, he received a Ford Foundation Grant to study Persian Court Music (an ancient and lovely tradition that was rapidly disappearing). We spent two years in Iran, living with his family and giving birth to our first child.

His family, being old aristocracy, was nothing like the terrible family of the young woman in “Not Without My Daughter.” My experience was during the post World War II period when the young Shah finally roused himself to engage in modernization projects (something his father had done as the first modernizer after centuries of decay). My then husband’s family were patriotic, eager to see Iran get out from under the thrall of Islam, and they welcomed me—their educated and curious American daughter-in-law. Adding to my luck: I had an amazing and unique mother-in-law who was vibrant, beautiful, and wise, and we took to each other and were friends until her premature death right after the Islamic Revolution.

My experience was very different from that of the Sally Field character who went to Iran at the wrong time and into the worst kind of family—pious merchant class people.

And years after my marriage ended, I was sent to Iran on a project that involved cross-cultural training—and this was during a period that the revolution was brewing. I did try to notify my Congressman at the time and the State Department Iran Chair, but I was not believed. I was being politically incorrect, it seems.

ITF:

When you first set eyes on the landscape and the people, what went through your mind? Was it excitement, amazement or possibly fear?

Dr. Farhat-Holzman:

The landscape around Tehran looked much like that of Utah—a reality that many Iranian students recognized as they were sent to school in Utah to study agriculture. Our arrival was something of a family event—and we were much welcomed and (being pregnant) fussed over. As I learned Farsi, and as we traveled around the country, I became much more comfortable. I fell in love with Esfahan, the old Capital, a city that I found as beautiful as Florence, Italy. And Shiraz, a 7,000 foot city full of orange blossoms and wildflowers in the countryside around it, was the home of some of Iran’s most famous poets—much loved by everyone. The Caspian Sea region (finally free of malaria by the government eradication program) was as beautiful as Hawaii—forested mountains and green rice and tea fields. I never traveled anywhere that I had to wear a veil. Modern women did not do that then.

ITF:

The Infidel Task Force is a major supporter of women’s rights around the world. We see everyday how women are treated in the Islamic countries and it can be repulsive and degrading. I think you can see where I am going with this, and I would like you to give us an overview on how the Iranian women lived at that time compared to how they are treated today.

Dr. Farhat-Holzman:

I was in Iran at the height of modernization, and I did not know any women who wore a chador (head-to-toe cloak); I only saw them on villagers and the urban poor. At one time, only prostitutes wore them (a story pushed by the government). This situation has been reversed.

Today, young women increasingly defy the government, pushing their headscarves further back on their heads and wearing tight and more revealing clothing. They never know from day to day when the religious morality thugs will beat them for this, but they do it anyway.

ITF:

How did the Pahlavi government engage in the educational aspect of the Iranian women and was there any attempt to modernize Islam as compared to Iran today?

Dr. Farhat-Holzman:

The Pahlavi Dynasty (Reza Shah and his son) were determined to emancipate women to European standards. The upper classes were the first to do so—but increasingly this movement was picked up by the burgeoning middle class of professionals and the more prosperous merchants. Bright girls were sent abroad to school (I personally knew one village girl who later became an engineer—but there were many others.)

The young women who were caught up in what they thought was a wonderful socialist revolution found out quickly what the Ayatollah and his cabal planned for them. The marriage age was once more lowered, complete veiling mandated (violators punished), and such customs as cutting off hands and stoning adulteresses were revived in rural areas.

Mandatory brainwashing and hours of religious training replaced normal school subjects—much resented by many students, but difficult to defy.

ITF:

If you were to teach us one important factor of Iranian culture past and present, what would that factor be? Are you still in contact with individuals there and do you have any desire to return to Iran?

Dr. Farhat-Holzman:

I would say that Iran (Persia) is far older than Islam, and that it has a continuing identity that even the Ayatollah was not able to wipe out—although he tried. This is a country with arts, literature, and government practices that were the model for much of the ancient world. They were rivals of the Greeks and Romans—and later Byzantines---and the educated still know this. The great national epic: The Shahname (Book of Kings) was written in the 10th century while Persia was under Muslim occupation. The language was deliberately Persian, eliminating as much as possible any Arabic words, and the story tracks Iran’s identity from mythical beginnings until the Arab invasion. This marvelous work is still read by story tellers all over Iran—and is on Radio Tehran daily for people to do their exercises to its drumbeats and poetry.

And no, I have no desire to go back until the Islamic government is gone. When that happens, I have promised to lead a tour to the real Iran.

ITF:

The Infidel Task Force has a contributor living in Iran. He tells us that currently, sentiment towards the western world or specifically Americans, is running about 50% against. I believe many of our readers would like to know how did the Iranian people feel about Americans during your time there as opposed to what is happening in Iran today.

Dr. Farhat-Holzman:

I have heard that the US is the most popular country in the world to Iranians today. What their government hates, they love. I don’t know who your consultant is—but I really doubt that assessment.

After World War II, Iranians loved the US, primarily because we had never done anything to them, not the case with the Russians and the British, both of whom were hated. That changed after the abortive coup of Mossadegh was put down. America replaced the British as the hated country—despite anyone with money sending their children to school here. Now we are loved again.

ITF:

Dr Farhat-Holzman, you say that your perspective on radicalized Islam is a combination of domestic experience, professional experience and your background as a historian. Can you clarify that statement? Did you ever experience the radical aspect of Islam?

Dr. Farhat-Holzman:

Except for the occasional midnight phone call and letters to the editor complaining about my newspaper columns, I have never been personally threatened. One time in San Francisco, I was lecturing about “The War Inside of Islam” at the Commonwealth club—and a group of Islamists attended (including women in full hijab) and they tried to disrupt the talk. The audience threw them out.

ITF:

As a professor of Islamic Civilization, how was the subject received by your Muslim students as compared to your American students? I assume you did have Muslim students. Was there ever a case of vocalized militancy?

Dr. Farhat-Holzman:

I had no Muslim students, but I did have plenty of students from Malaysia and Indonesia, Chinese Christians, and a few Hindus, who had no problem with what I was teaching. And in those days, I was much kinder to Islam than I am today. However, in one of my classes, I had the students read The Satanic Verses by Salmon Rushdie. A Muslim student not in my class buttonholed me in the hall to ask why I would teach such a hateful book that was so unkind to Islam. I told him to come back after he read the book, not before he had even opened it. He backed off.

ITF:

A growing number of people in the United States feel that America is under siege by radical Islamic leaders attempting to dismantle the US Constitution and replace it with Shariah Law. This is actually documented in some of your papers. Do you feel it is a real possibility? Or are we Americans truly protected by the Constitution?

Dr. Farhat-Holzman:

I think there are Islamists who would like to see this, but it is not going to happen. We are not only protected by the Constitution, but by the increasingly ugly behavior of Islamists who think they can do this by force. They not only have pushback from us, but from the majority of secular Muslims (such as Iranian immigrants) who will have none of it.

ITF:

Lastly Dr. if you were to say which country is in the most danger of becoming totally controlled by radicalized Islamists, which one would that be?

Dr. Farhat-Holzman:

Pakistan. I really fear for them. And I am not terribly happy with what is happening to Egypt either.

ITF:

What was the cultural difference between your husband’s Iranian family and yours and did it put a strain on your marriage?

Dr. Farhat-Holzman:

No. The cultural differences were not an issue between us. My marriage failed because my husband was a romanatic who loved falling in love, but not staying in love. He was always looking for the perfect women—a process that gave him four marriages, none of which succeeded. This characteristic is not unique to Iranians, alas.

ITF:

When you made the decision to move to Iran, what kind of mental preparation and self convincing did you have to go through to do it? Or was it something performed on whim?

Dr. Farhat-Holzman:

I never moved to Iran. It was always understood that we were visiting Iran as graduate students on a project—and we left after the project was completed. When I went back years later, it was also for a project. I never considered living there.

ITF:

With respect on raising children in an Islamic society, were your children raised in a totally Islamic fashion or a more Western slant? At what point are male and female children separated in an Islamic country?

Dr. Farhat-Holzman:

None of this applied. My children were reared here. Both my son and daughter had a short period of staying with their father (I thought they should have that experience) but they returned to resume their schooling here. Since the family I married into was merely nominally Muslim, none of the horrors of Islamic child rearing applied. Islam never played a role.

ITF:

Thank you very much for coming Dr Farhat-Holman. I’m sure our readers will want you to come back for another chat. Would you do that for us?

Dr. Farhat-Holzman:

Of course! And thank you.

It’s the Clerics, Stupid!!!!

2010-09-29T15:59:00.000-07:00

Everyone who knows me by now, knows I do not hate muslims. None of us here truly hate muslims. What we despise are the Islamic clerics.

Now there are vile, ignorant and crazy spokespeople for all ranks of life. Government, religion, Hollywood and of course…

the news media (Keith Olbermann comes to mind. Now there's a real idiot!)

But for now, lets concentrate on what we do best. ISLAM!! Now THEY have the front runners when it comes to crazies…the Clerics. Oh yes, the Clerics. Here is a bunch of total idiotic, lust crazed, saliva drooling, maniacal whack jobs.

Why don’t we look at a few of the recent media releases pertaining to the wacky world of Islamic clerics…..

Cleric Admits Role in Bombing Cricket Stadium...

BANGALORE: 8/25/10 - PDP leader and 2008 Bangalore blasts accused Abdul Nasser Madani has admitted role in the Bangalore stadium blasts which necessitated the shifting of two IPL matches to Mumbai, official sources said on Tuesday.

Interrogation of Madani, an accused in the 2008 serial bomb blasts here, has revealed his role in the twin explosions near the cricket stadium here ahead of an IPL match on April 17 this year, Home Minister V S Acharya said on Tuesday.

An Islamic “holy man” has a role in murder…

Clerics Call Pakistani Floods 'Allah's Wrath' for Secularism...

The monsoon rains that hit Swat a month ago, before sending a devastating tide south, have washed away homes, livelihoods, much of its high-grade rice crop and - in some quarters - hopes of extinguishing residual support for Islamic extremism among a population who lived under the yoke of the Taliban for more than two years.

But the message from the country's most conservative imams - that the floods were God's punishment for the secularisation of the state - is taking hold in this long-suffering region.

Maybe Allah is punishing those violent Pakistanis…

NEXT….

Egyptian Cleric: Allah will Destroy West, Muslims to Conquer World

Egyptian cleric Salem Abu Al-Futuh: The nation of Islam will return – despite our current crisis and despite the arrogance of the West. The West is bound to be destroyed. Just like Allah destroyed the Byzantine and Persian empires, He will destroy the West at the hands of the Muslims. This is an unequivocal promise. These countries will convert to Islam. Islam will reach these countries.

By Allah, we will conquer Italy. By Allah, we will conquer Italy and move into [the rest] of Europe. Islam will enter that entire region. Even America, you ask? Yes, even America. North or south America? Both North and South America. We will enter all these countries, and people there will be joining Islam in droves.

...and the muslims go running out into the streets screaming....DEATH TO AMERICA!!!

AUSTRALIAN MUSLIM HATE PREACHER CALLS FOR DUTCH MP GEERT WILDERS TO BE BEHEADED........
Friday, September 03, 2010 - Dutch Muslim radicals are calling for Wilders to be beheaded. The call comes from the Australian hate preacher Feiz Muhammad (40), by intelligence agencies worldwide as one of the main jihadist ideologues, a great inspiration for Western, young Muslim radicals.

Feiz Muhammad within intelligence circles is in the same breath as notorious spiritual jihad leaders and the US-Yemeni Muslim preacher Anwar al-Awlaki, a major recruiter for Al Qaeda, which is seen as the inspiration behind the failed attack with an aircraft over Detroit. According to Ronald Sandee, former employee of the MIVD and director of a U.S. anti-terrorist "assassination of the call for Wilders to be taken very seriously".

And here we have a holy man calling for murder.

So there you have a small example of how the clerics turn out to be a major problem for the moderate muslim.

So what do all of these whack jobs have in common? Islam. What does that tell us? Islam has very big problems. Muslims are looked upon as violent and capable of killing us with absolutely no remorse. With a thirst for the blood of the non-believer, muslims march out with their knives, guns and machetes…following the orders of their beloved clerics. Africa is saturated with infidel blood thanks to muslim clerics calling for the death of Christians

These are just a few recent examples of whats driving the average muslim . Leave the muslim alone and he’ll live along side of you peacefully. He would have no problem assimilating into our country.

Bottom line is…we know what the problem is. We know whats stirring the pot. Question is…what do we do about it?

BlackbootJack

The Chamberlain Effect

2010-03-06T15:44:00.000-08:00

You can keep staring at that Black Widow spider sitting up in the corner of your ceiling. You can say it is sleeping. You can say it is benign. You can say anything you want to keep your mind at ease, but you know as well as that spider, that when you are sleeping it is coming down to bite you.

Islam, is like that spider. Silent, slow, unassuming....but very, very deadly, and while we sleep, it is coming down to bite us. Muslim extremists show us everyday, that they indeed are out to dominate the world. Murders, bombings, tortures, genocide, happening everyday all over the world. It seems wherever Islam goes, there is going to be violence.

Americans, basically are forgiving people. We look for the good in everyone and everything. We want to think that everyone should love each other and we can all just get along.

Islam showed America just how it feels towards her people. On October 12, 2000, the USS Cole was victim of a suicide attack while it was harbored and refueling in the Yemeni port of Aden. Seventeen American sailors were killed, and thirty-nine were injured.
Liberals asked..."Oh what did we do wrong to bring this upon us?"
The Islamic Sudanese are starving the Christians in Darfur, and the United Nations sleeps.
Hamas, Hezbollah, Jamaat ul-Fuqra, all listed as terror groups, have bases within the borders of the United States. Not one word is spoken by any law enforcement agency.
Of course everyone remembers 9/11. When 19 radical muslim extremists hi-jacked four planes. Two were flown into the World Trade Center in NYC. One crashed into the Pentagon. The fourth came down in a field in Pennsylvania. And of course we all believe that muslim terrorists were behind that heinous act of war...right?
Wrong!
More than a third of the American public suspects that federal officials assisted in the 9/11 terrorist attacks or took no action to stop them so the United States could go to war in the Middle East, according to a new Scripps Howard/Ohio University poll.
Some polls say as many as 80% of Americans believe the US government had something to do with 9/11.
Really? Unbelievable. If I remember...Osama bin Laden admitted to orchestrating the entire event. Did anyone else see that? No? It was a video.
Today in America, we have Islam making inroads within our public schools. Liberal colleges feel that Islam is getting a bad rap and pretty much lets the muslim student associations run anything they want. Although they freely publicize the anti-Semitic attitude that muslims in general vocalize, and many are merely an outlet for Islamic radicalization. But...we choose to ignore this and basically look the other way.
Try this exercise....make a sign that says: Islam must be banned. Now go stand in your cities downtown center. I give you about 5 or 6 minutes before people come up to you and call you a racist, Islamaphobe, hater, war monger, among other names. Meanwhile, the muslims will either be sitting in the background smiling while the everyday citizen does the work, or they go crying to CAIR that you were not following political correctness.
America is sound asleep.

Thomas Sowell said it best:
"When the majority of the people become like sheep and will tolerate intolerance rather than make a fuss, then there is no limit to how far any group will go."

When we ignore what is happening around us, when we refuse to admit that terror is on our doorstep, when we close our eyes to the fact that a violent ideology is marching into our cities to subvert our culture, dominate our society and remove the most populous religion with their own.....I call it The Chamberlain Effect.

Arthur Neville Chamberlain (18 March 1869 – 9 November 1940) was a British politician who served as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom from May 1937 to May 1940. Chamberlain is best known for his appeasement foreign policy, and in particular for his signing of the Munich Agreement in 1938, conceding the Sudetenland region of Czechoslovakia to Nazi Germany. When Adolf Hitler continued his aggression, Britain declared war on Germany on 3 September 1939, and Chamberlain led Britain through the first eight months of World War II.

The same can be said for the American leadership. The current government does not dare correlate Islam with any act of muslim violence in this country. Not the Fort Hood shooter, not the Christmas underwear bomber. The war on terror is no longer related to radical Islam. It doesn't matter that Islamic extremists ARE out to kill us. The latest rule from the White House....Do not mention terrorist and Islam in the same conversation. I find this appalling.

The same can be said for basically all Americans. Lets go back to the little protest sign that I had you make. If you were to do that protest, you will be hounded out of town. Why? Because people will not want to believe what you have written. They want to believe that Islam is the victim, and we all know how muslims love to play the victim. Oh yes.....they are the victims. The poor, poor muslims. The same muslims that will kill their own daughters if they become too westernized. The same poor, poor muslims that behead their wives if they ask for a divorce. The same muslim students that will chant and attack the stage of any speaker that dares to speak out against the violence Islam brings. The very same muslims that kill over cartoons, that demand the death of teachers over teddy bears. The very same muslims that scream Death To The Jews, riot in the streets, create Muslim Only zones in cities, and threaten the lives of billions of people on this planet.....while we sleep.
Unfortunately, you will pay for it in the future.
That spider is coming down, and if we don't wake up.........

Muslim scholars: Airport scanners against our religion

2010-02-12T06:14:00.000-08:00

February 12, 2010

ASSOCIATED PRESS
Saying that body scanners that can see through clothes violate Islamic law, Muslim-American groups are supporting a "fatwa" -- a religious ruling -- that forbids Muslims from going through the scanners at airports.

The Fiqh Council of North America, a body of Islamic scholars, issued a fatwa that says going through the airport scanners would violate Islamic rules on modesty.

"It is a violation of clear Islamic teachings that men or women be seen naked by other men and women," reads the fatwa. "Islam highly emphasizes haya [modesty] and considers it part of faith. The Quran has commanded the believers, both men and women, to cover their private parts."

The Muslim groups are urging members to undergo patdowns instead.

BULLSHIT!! Just another way to get around the system....soon you'll see signs in airports:
MUSLIMS GO THIS WAY ----->

EVERYBODY ELSE Go HERE ------>

This country is rapidly become a country of religious seperation.

French Call for Veil Ban in Public Buildings

2010-01-25T14:45:00.000-08:00

Monday, January 25, 2010

PARIS — A French parliamentary panel will stop short of recommending a ban on face-covering veils in the street and instead will ask for the garb to be banned in public facilities such as hospitals, the panel's president says.

The 32-member panel's report due Tuesday culminates a six-month inquiry into the wearing of all-encompassing veils that began after President Nicolas Sarkozy said in June that they are "not welcome" on French territory.

Andre Gerin, a Communist lawmaker who heads the multiparty panel, said the report contains a "multitude of proposals" to ban such garb in places like schools, hospitals and other public buildings, but not private buildings or on the street.

Gerin stressed the need to move "progressively" toward a law banning the attire in the streets and to work "hand in hand" with Muslim leaders and associations.

A 2004 French law bans Muslim headscarves from classrooms.

Muslim religious leaders have warned that a law banning face-covering attire in the streets could stigmatize Muslims and drive some to extremism. They were joined last week by Roman Catholic and Jewish leaders who said they consider such a drastic step unnecessary.

France has Western Europe's largest Muslim population, estimated at some 5 million. Only a tiny minority of Muslim women wear such attire, usually a "niqab" pinned across the face to cover all but the eyes.

Critics of the veils call them a gateway to extremism, an insult to gender equality and an offense to France's secular system.

"It is perhaps a marginal problem, but it is the visible part of the iceberg," Gerin said in a recent interview. "Behind the iceberg is a black tide of ... fundamentalism." He denounced those he called "gurus" or "French Taliban" who, he claimed, promote a radical brand of Islam that forces women and girls to hide themselves.

Critics of a formal ban have raised concerns about the constitutionality of state mandates on dress.

"I don't think an ideology should be fought through constraining measures but through ideas," Mohammed Moussaoui, the head of a coalition of Muslim organizations, said in an interview. "It's very difficult to talk about the liberation of women through a law that constrains." (WHAT??? HUH???- BBJ)

Introduction to The Infidel Task Force

2010-01-09T17:07:00.000-08:00

What Oath? Muslims Unfit for Citizenship and Military Duty

2010-01-05T14:07:00.001-08:00

By Scott W. Winchell

Editor-in-Chief; Interim CEO; Stand Up America Project

In 1960, one of the biggest questions in the race for the Presidency between John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon was Kennedy’s religion. Being a Catholic, Kennedy was asked if his allegiance was to the country or the Pope. In those days, the same as today, in Catholicism, each adherent was first a Catholic, and second, a citizen of their country.

On Sept. 12, 1960, presidential candidate John F. Kennedy gave a major speech to the Greater Houston Ministerial Association, a group of Protestant ministers, on the issue of his religion. At the time, many Protestants questioned whether Kennedy’s Roman Catholic faith would allow him to make important national decisions as president independent of the church. Kennedy addressed those concerns before a skeptical audience of Protestant clergy.

The following is from a transcript of Kennedy’s speech:

But because I am a Catholic, and no Catholic has ever been elected president, the real issues in this campaign have been obscured – perhaps deliberately, in some quarters less responsible than this. So it is apparently necessary for me to state once again not what kind of church I believe in – for that should be important only to me – but what kind of America I believe in.

I believe in an America where the separation of church and state is absolute, where no Catholic prelate would tell the president (should he be Catholic) how to act, and no Protestant minister would tell his parishioners for whom to vote; where no church or church school is granted any public funds or political preference; and where no man is denied public office merely because his religion differs from the president who might appoint him or the people who might elect him.

Apparently, this was enough to resolve the question, and he won the election. Today, we have a new question of allegiance. Not a question regarding Catholicism, but rather, Islam. The reason we ask this question is based on the fact, that a Muslim, is a Muslim first no matter where that person lives. Islam recognizes Dar el Islam, the “house of Islam” as any place a Muslim is present. Islam may not control that place, but the man that proclaims his devotion and submission to Allah is by Sha’ariah Law, a Muslim first and foremost.

Islam means submission, literally; there is no doubt that a devout Muslim must proclaim this or he is an apostate. This is something worse than an infidel, or non-believer, for he has forsaken his duty to Allah. Therefore, he must always be a Muslim first, and that means he is not only unable, but also forbidden from acting in any other fashion. If he is in our military, he may take orders, and obey, but at some level, when the order runs afoul of Islam, he must revert to Islam first. This is very obvious in the case of the terrorist, Major Nidal Hasan at Fort Hood.

Unlike Catholicism, Islam enforces this by the sword. In many lands around the world, there are frequent examples of this enforcement, especially among the woman in Islam. Honor killings are frequent and occur everywhere, even here in the USA, Canada, Great Britain, and many other places in the western world. Kennedy, back in 1960 was not even ex-communicated let alone receiving a Fatwa from an Imam, declaring he must die, and that all Muslims are duty bound to carry this edict out. This is a religious edict known only to Islam. Somehow, Major Nidal found that he could no longer be a member of the Military and decided to act on his devoutness to Islam, and to proceed to kill his own military comrades to whom he swore an oath.

Therefore, as we see in Hasan’s example, Islam is first in the mind of the devout, and it is clear that he never intended on living up to his oath as a soldier. He took the license of takiya, the Islamic right to lie for the sake of Islam to infidels. His oath never mattered and therefore, regarless of any oath a Muslim takes, it is to be totally discounted. Not only did he commit acts of terrorism, he also broke numerous laws, both military and civil. The worst of which was violating 18 U.S.C. § 2385 : US Code – Section 2385: Advocating overthrow of Government:

Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government…shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.

These are acts of Sedition and Treason. But to a Muslim, they are acts of devotion to Allah. So which prevails? As a free society where we are a land of laws, not men, the former applies. So we now have a very real question of loyalty.

To a lesser degree, when a Muslim from another land is naturalized in the United States, and they swear an oath to gain citizenship, to whom are they beholding? When a recruit signs up for the military, takes the oath, yet declares he is a Muslim on the form, what should we expect?

Here is the oath on citizenship:

I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God.

Or was that Allah?

Here are the oaths for the military:

I, (state your name), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God. (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962).

I, (State your name) (SSAN), having been appointed an officer in the Army of the United States, as indicated above in the grade of (BLANK) do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservations or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God. (DA Form 71, 1 August 1959, for officers.)

Citizenship form n-400 also asks whether or not the applicant has:

…advocated the overthrow of any government by force or violence (either directly or indirectly)?

I think a great many Muslims would fail this test immediately if it could be proven, but takiya absolves them anyway under Islam if they lie about it. How do we prove or disprove these issues?

The answer is clear, we cannot. If we tried, the ACLU would file cases by the boatload. Therefore the only sane thing to do to protect us from the Hasan’s of the world and Islamic deceit is to ban any person with Muslim affiliation of any sort from both citizenship and military service. Islam has no place in modern society. It is a barbaric political ideology, not a religion, and therefore, it is akin to citizenship from another country. Islam knows no boundaries, but acts as if it were a separate state. Therefore, we should treat them as if they were. They are devout, abiding peoples of another country/state make no mistake about it.

Somali charged in attack on Danish cartoonist

2010-01-02T11:38:00.000-08:00

By JAN M. OLSEN, Associated Press Writer Jan M. Olsen, Associated Press Writer – 11 mins ago
COPENHAGEN – A Somali man was charged Saturday with two counts of attempted murder for an attack on a Danish artist whose 2005 cartoon of the Prophet Muhammad ignited riots and outrage across the Muslim world, authorities said.

The artist — 74-year-old Kurt Westergaard — was moved to an undisclosed location for his own protection.

The 28-year-old Somali man with ties to al-Qaida broke into Westergaard's home in Aarhus on Friday night armed with an ax and a knife, said Jakob Scharf, head of Denmark's PET intelligence agency.

Westergaard, who has been the target of several death threats since depicting the Prophet Muhammad with a bomb-shaped turban, pressed an alarm and fled with his 5-year-old granddaughter to a specially made safe room. He had been under round-the-clock protection by Danish security agents.

Officers arrived two minutes later and tried to arrest the assailant, but then shot him in the hand and knee when he threatened them with the ax, said Preben Nielsen of the Aarhus police.

Nielsen said the man's wounds were serious but not life-threatening, and Westergaard was "quite shocked" by the attack but was not injured.

The Somali man denied the charges at a court hearing Saturday in Aarhus, Denmark's second largest city, 125 miles (200 kilometers) northwest of Copenhagen. Accompanied by a lawyer, he was wheeled into the court on a stretcher from the hospital where he was being treated.

Chief Superintendent Ole Madsen in Aarhus said the man was charged with two counts of attempted murder: one on Westergaard and one on a police officer. The court also banned publication of the man's name.

"He will be in custody for four weeks, and in isolation for two," Madsen said, adding that the Somali would be moved to the Vestre Faengsel prison in Aarhus, which has medical facilities.

His defense lawyer, Niels Christian Strauss, told reporters outside the court he had urged his client to remain silent during the hearing to give him more time to examine the evidence.

Westergaard remains a potential target for extremists nearly five years after he drew a caricature of the Prophet Muhammad along with 11 other Danish cartoonists that were printed in the Jyllands-Posten newspaper. Since Westergaard's cartoon is viewed the most provocative, he is the only of the twelve to live under round-the-clock protection.

The Jyllands-Posten had asked Danish cartoonists to draw Muhammad as a challenge to a perceived self-censorship, not to insult Muslims. Still, Danish and other Western embassies in several Muslim countries were torched a few months later in 2006 by angry protesters who felt the cartoons had profoundly insulted Islam.

Islamic law generally opposes any depiction of the prophet, even favorable, for fear it could lead to idolatry.

The Somali man had won an asylum case and received a residency permit to stay in Denmark, Scharf said, declaring the Friday attack "terror related."

"The arrested man has, according to PET's information, close relations to the Somali terrorist group al-Shabab and al-Qaida leaders in eastern Africa," Scharf said. "(The attack) again confirms the terror threat that is directed at Denmark and against the cartoonist Kurt Westergaard in particular."

Scharf said the man is suspected of having been involved in terror-related activities in east Africa and had been under PET's surveillance but not in connection with Westergaard.

Westergaard could not be reached for comment. However, he told his employer, the Jyllands-Posten, that the assailant shouted "Revenge!" and "Blood!" as he tried to enter the bathroom where Westergaard and the child had sought shelter.

"My grandchild did fine," Westergaard said, according to the newspaper's Web site. "It was scary. It was close. Really close. But we did it."

Westergaard has received previous death threats and was the subject of an alleged assassination plot.

In October, terror charges were brought against two Chicago men who planned to kill Westergaard and newspaper's former cultural editor. That trial has not yet begun.

In 2008, Danish police arrested two Tunisian men suspected of plotting to kill Westergaard. Neither suspect was prosecuted. One was deported and the other was released Monday after an immigration board rejected PET's efforts to expel him from Denmark.

Throughout the crisis, then-Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen distanced himself from the cartoons but resisted calls to apologize for them, citing freedom of speech and saying his government could not be held responsible for the actions of Denmark's press.

An umbrella organization for moderate Muslims in Denmark condemned the Friday attack.

"The Danish Muslim Union strongly distances itself from the attack and any kind of extremism that leads to such acts," the group said in a statement.

But I'm sure it is all for show. - BBJ

Islamism on the Attack

2009-12-30T16:12:00.000-08:00

You can bet your next paycheck that another attack is imminent. Its coming, and its very near.

Just take a look at 2009....6 attempted attacks and one succesful attack causing the death of 13 and injuring 22. And we are so complacent about it.

When will our leaders wake up and do their damn jobs and follow the Constitution. That is to maintain the safety and security of the American people.

I gave Obama a lot of space, but my patience is wearing thin. Elections in 2010 are going to be interesting.

Another thing I don't understand, is the news media and the American people themselves. Do they not see anything going on?

Look at decades ago....you never or seldom heard of radicalize Islam terror attacks.

NOW...a day doesn't go by when its mentioned in the media. You see it on the news "crawl" at the bottom of the television screen. Everyday! Every damn day!!

Whenever there is an attack or attempted terror attack, our leaders set up new rules or new regulations. How about being a little pro-active for a change?

Start getting the CIA and the FBI and the Homeland Security working in tandem. Start sharing information.

Review and renew the Patriot Act...NOW!!

Maintain Gitmo, keep it open. Send all islamic terrorist there and hold them forever. When word gets around that if you get caught, your jailed for life. They do not get the protection of the US Constitution.

Stop muslim immigration. Immediately.

Allow the FBI to do its job!! Servailance on Islamic mosques is imperative.

Wherever you go...keep your eyes and ears open. My daughter just flew back to Denver and she profiled the people in the airport. She sat next to a man, she thought might be Middle-Eastern and she kept her eyes on him. This is what everybody has to do.

Most Americans do not realize...that if they report suspicious activity...they are immune from any law suit that may be brought from the accused. They will not be sued!! This is a fact, its the LAW!

We are at war.

Americans are afraid to cause a stir. They are afraid they may offend someone. We are so politcally correct, we are putting our lives in danger. Americans don't want to grasp the thought, that there are thugs out there, that want to kill us!! They want us dead. They want our children dead. Islamic militants hate us and everything we stand for. For whatever reason extremist feel they are fighting for, they want us dead.

Islam is to be the dominate religion in America.

Israel is to leave Palestine.

America will have Shariah Law.

Whatever the reason. They are here, and it only takes a few.

In the coming months, something is going to change with our governemnt. Either they are going to get wise to Islamic radicals and start doing what we elected them to do and that is to keep us safe.Or they simply will give up, apologize and let the Islamist run amok in our country. Already we see more and more radicals standing and preaching on street corners, promoting the over throw of the government and the implementation of Shariah Law.

The only thing keeping them at bay right now is FOX News and the internet.

So there will be more attacks. And if the Obama administration keeps its eyes and ears closed, we are all doomed.

What will it take? A downed airliner? Or something a little more deadly?

Maybe a school takeover?

As-Sabiqun

2009-12-28T16:50:00.000-08:00

"As-Sabiqun is an Islamic movement that believes in the Islamic State of North America no later than 2050. Those who engage in this great effort require a high level of commitment and determination. We are sending out a call to the believers: Join with us in this great struggle to change the world!"

-Imam Musa, the Washington, DC, imam who supports jihad terror and Islamic supremacism.

I believe Abu Bakr Ba'shir puts the situation in the easiest to understand light for us Kuffar: "The path taken by many political parties in their effort to establish an Islamic regime is not the right path, because these parties adopt democracy. Democracy is not an Islamic means. Democracy runs counter to Islam, because it emphasizes the sovereignty of the people, whereas Islam emphasizes the sovereignty of Allah.
Thus, if we are to submit to the law of Allah, Muslims have no choice but to say: 'We hear and obey.' In democracy, Allah's commands may be open to discussion, and if we agree with them, we accept them, but if we do not agree with them, we reject them. Herein lies the flaw. Therefore, as long as the Islamic political parties endeavor to adhere to Islam by means of democracy, they will not achieve their goal

"It is a duty… We are duty-bound to establish an Islamic state, and the Muslims are duty-bound to live in an Islamic country. Muslims are forbidden to live in an infidel country. Sheik Fawzan Al-Fawzan issued a fatwa forbidding Muslims to live in the countries of the infidels. That is why we are committed to establishing an Islamic state.

The path that the Prophet Muhammad bid us to take is the path of preaching and Jihad. Waging Jihad is the proper conduct. That is why it is essential to establish an Islamic state by means of preaching and Jihad. We have tried to do this in Indonesia, by committing ourselves to Islamic preaching."

Islam by its very existence us sedition. Mr. Bakr Ba’shir understands the Koran well, and bases his assessment on his perfect understanding of the Islamic imperative. We would do well to listen to him, and heed his words.

I like our country the way it is.
There are already too many "Islamic" states in the world, but I'm sure that one of them will allow you to immigrate to it.
Think of it! Sharia law is already imposed. Women are property. You can own slaves. Dhimmis have been subdued (or killed). Everybody knows (or is afraid to admit otherwise) that the Qur'an is the perfect book. All the other books are burned. Imagination is dead. Women are "dressed" in cloth Hefty bags.
This is as close to Paradise that a Muslim can get! Why live in the decadent West? Get yourself back to your posse! You'll feel so much better.
Frankly, so will we.

Mohammed

2009-12-28T16:43:00.000-08:00

Mohammed entered his classroom on the first day of school.
"What is your name?" asked the teacher.

"Mohammed". . .. answered the kid.

"You are in America now. From now on your name will be Johnny," replied the teacher.

In the evening, Mohammed returned home. "How was your day, Mohammed?" asked his mother.

"My name is not Mohammed. Im in America and now my name is Johnny."

"Ah, are you ashamed of your name, are you trying to dishonor your parents, your heritage, your religion? Shame on you!" and she beat him.

Then she called his father and he too beat him.

The next day Mohammed returned to school.

When the teacher saw him with all the bruises she asked, "What happened to you little Johnny"?

"Well ma'am, 20 hours after becoming an American,
I was attacked by two friggin Arabs."

Fort Hood Denial – by Jamie Glazov

2009-12-24T06:01:00.000-08:00

As the United States prepares to try Nidal Malik Hasan for 13 counts of murder and 32 counts of attempted murder at Fort Hood last month, few question the suspect’s guilt, but many disagree about his motives.

Yet the evidence is now conclusive: the Fort Hood massacre was an act of Islamic terror. Before his shooting spree, Hasan told colleagues that non-Muslims were infidels condemned to hell and that they should be beheaded and have boiling oil poured down their throats.

Hasan traded 18 e-mails with Anwar al-Awlaki, an al-Qaida recruiter. On the morning of the massacre, he gave his neighbor a Koran as he was departing for the base, telling her that he was going to do “good work for God.” Wearing Pakistani garb, Hasan shouted “Allahu akbar” as he began firing at U.S. troops.
Despite the plentiful evidence, however, leftists refuse to accept Hasan’s Islamic inspiration.

We’ve heard the rationalizations: Hasan was a nut; the stresses of serving in the military drove him crazy; he experienced anti-Islamic discrimination; anyone is capable of “losing it” under such stressful conditions; and so on.

These reflexive denials are a logical continuation of the Left’s long tradition of denying the evil of our totalitarian enemies—or, when forced to acknowledge them, blaming them on the United States. This was the pattern throughout the Cold War, and it’s continued during the War on Terror.

When it’s proven beyond reasonable doubt that jihadism was in fact Hasan’s motive, here’s a prediction: leftists will either fall into apathetic silence or respond that it was American racism, oppression, and Islamophobia that forced Hasan’s hand.

To recognize the evil of Nidal Hasan and his ideology, to admit the existence of pernicious enemies, is to concede that there are societies, cultures, and systems that are much more unjust than ours. This is an untenable step for leftists to take, because it means acknowledging that there is something superior about our civilization that’s worth saving and defending.

The notion that his own society is evil and unjust is the bedrock of the leftist’s vision. Wicked capitalists trample on the poor, the oppressed, and the downtrodden; the leftist appoints himself to rescue these victims.

He is a self-styled social redeemer, leading a movement to liberate the masses, even if it results in the destruction of his own society. This political mission provides him with immense moral indignation and, therefore, moral superiority, dispositions from which, in turn, he derives emotional self-gratification. His whole belief system provides him with a sense of belonging; he joins other social redeemers, as well as the victims, real or imagined, who wait for him to break their chains.

Thus, the leftist’s political disposition is a faith that reinforces his personal identity and sense of belonging. Admitting that Hasan is a jihadist would undermine that faith. It would also expose the leftist to potential excommunication from his social community.

He’d become politically suspect to his peers, perhaps even accused of becoming a reactionary right-winger. That’s why we will continue to witness more Fort Hood denial from the Left, with all of its irrationality and disregard for human life.

To get the whole story on the Left’s Jihad Denial, read Jamie Glazov’s new book, United in Hate: The Left’s Romance with Tyranny and Terror.

The Burqa Barbie

2009-12-03T16:53:00.000-08:00

By now everyone has heard of the Burqa Barbie that was brought out by Matell.... I and many others from ACT 4 America had sent them e-mails noting our displeasure with that doll. Here is their response to my e-mail:

From: FP Consumer Affairs (CATS) FPConsumerAffairsCATS@Fisher-Price.com

Subject: In Reference to Case Number: 17530577

Date: Thursday, December 3, 2009, 5:25 PM

In Reference to Case Number: 17530577

Thank you for contacting us. We appreciate the opportunity to respond. In this case, Italian artist and designer Eliana Lorena used Barbie as a model to showcase her interpretation of cultural dress from around the world. Barbie was literally her canvas and the outfits were the artist's personal expression. This was one of the 500 different Barbie dolls representing 500 different cultures that were auctioned at a charity event. Barbie has no religious affiliation and we have no plans to make commercial editions of the dolls. These dolls are not available for sale.

Sincerely,

Mattel Consumer Relations service.mattel.com

So there you have it. Listen people...if we don't speak up and display our displeasure and in some cases our outrage at things that concern us, we may as well just hand everything over to them. SPEAK UP!! Write those letters!! Remember what Martin Luther King once said: "Speak without fear."

Feds: Sudbury man planned terrorist attacks at shopping malls

2009-10-22T10:59:00.000-07:00

By Laura Crimaldi and Laurel J. Sweet Wednesday, October 21, 2009 -

http://news.bostonherald.com/news/regional/view.bg?articleid=1206282&srvc=home&position=emailed

A 27-year-old man from Sudbury has been arrested on charges he planned terrorism attacks inside and outside the United States, including a plot to use automatic weapons to open fire at shoppers and emergency responders in shopping malls, federal prosecutors said today.

Tarek Mehanna, of 6 Fairhaven Circle, is accused of conspiring with Ahmad Abousamra and others to obtain the automatic weapons needed to carry out a mall ambush in which they planned to open fire at random, said Acting U.S. Attorney Michael K. Loucks. Mehanna was already out on bail from a federal arrest last year, charged with lying during a terrorism probe.

Mehanna was arrested at his home at 6 a.m. this morning and booked at the Sudbury police station before being turned over to federal authorities. Federal agents have searched Mehanna’s home and say he is a U.S. citizen. A bail hearing has been scheduled for 1:30 p.m. in federal court.

Abousamra left the United States for Syria on Dec. 26, 2006, officials said. He said he would be back within a month after visiting his wife, but has never returned, officials said.

“At this time we don’t believe there are any active terrorist cells in this area,” said FBI special-agent-in-charge Warren T. Bamford.

The plot included plans to fire at emergency responders, but was abandoned because the men could not obtain the weapons, authorities said. They declined to name the mall or malls the men were targeting.

“We live in a free country. We don’t live in a police state. We do have places where if someone wants to do a terrorist act they can probably accomplish it,” said Loucks at a press conference. “We do our best. It’s amazing it hasn’t happened yet.”

Prosecutors also allege the men discussed participating in violent Jihad against American interests and their desire to die on the “battlefield.” The crimes are alleged to have taken place between 2001 and 2008.

Mehanna and Abousamra are also accused of traveling to Yemen in 2004 to find a terrorist training camp and learn how to engage in jihad, officials said.

Sudbury police chief Richard Glavin said he expects residents to be surprised by the development. There had been no calls for service to Mehanna’s home, where he lives with his parents, he said.

“I’m sure that people are concerned and alarmed,” said Glavin. “Regardless of where this occurred, in Sudbury or in other communities, this is obviously of concern to everyone.”

Mehanna was charged with lying to FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force investigators last year during a probe into whether Daniel Maldonado was participating in al-Qaeda training in Somalia. He was arrested in November 2008 at Logan International Airport while boarding a plane to Saudi Arabia for that offense. He was out on bail from that arrest when he was apprehended this morning.

In that case, FBI investigators interviewed Mehanna on Dec. 16, 2006, according to a federal complaint. The FBI alleges Mehanna knew Maldonado was training for jihad in Somalia. Further, the complaint states Maldonado was encouraging Mehanna to join him there.

Mehanna told the FBI Maldonado was working for a Web site in Egypt and had infrequent contact with him, the complaint states. The FBI asserted Maldonado had contacted Mehanna three times from Somalia on Dec. 12, 2006.

Maldonado was arrested in February 2007 near the Somalia border by Kenyan authorities on charges he trained at al-Qaeda camps in Somalia, the complaint states.

- This is the fifth attempted terror attack in the US in about 90 days. THANK GOD FOR OUR ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES!!! How long before one of these become succesful?
- BBJ

Mass man accused of plot to kill U.S politicians

2009-10-21T16:04:00.000-07:00

BOSTON – A Massachusetts man and two friends tried and failed to get into terrorist training camps and then plotted to kill two prominent U.S. politicians and randomly shoot people at American shopping malls, authorities said Wednesday.

Tarek Mehanna, who recently taught at a Muslim school in Worcester, was arrested early Wednesday at his parents' suburban Boston home. Mehanna was charged with conspiring with two other men — an American now in Syria and another man who is cooperating with authorities — to provide support to terrorists.

Ultimately, the trio never came close to pulling off an attack. Authorities say they never got the terrorist training they sought — that the men told friends they were turned down because of their nationality, ethnicity or inexperience, or that the people they'd hoped would get them into such camps were either in jail or on a religious pilgrimage.

The men abandoned the mall attack plans after their weapons contact said he could find only handguns, not automatic weapons.

The men used code words such as "peanut butter and jelly" for fighting in Somalia and "culinary school" for terrorist camps, and talked extensively of their desire to "die on the battlefield," according to court documents.

Mehanna, who has taught math and religion at Alhuda Academy, made a defiant court appearance hours after his arrest. He refused to stand to hear the charge against him and finally did — tossing his chair loudly to the floor — only after his father urged him to do so.

"This really, really is a show," his father, Ahmed Mehanna, said as his son was being led away in handcuffs. When asked if he believed the charges against his son, he said, "No, definitely not."

Prosecutors said Mehanna worked with two men from 2001 to May 2008 on the conspiracy that, over time, intended to "kill, kidnap, maim or injure" soldiers and two politicians who were members of the executive branch but are no longer in office. Authorities refused to identify the politicians and said they were never in danger.

Acting U.S. Attorney Michael Loucks said the men justified the planned attacks on malls because U.S. civilians pay taxes to support the U.S. government and because they are "nonbelievers," Loucks said. He refused to identify the targeted malls.
Mehanna — who received a doctorate in 2008 from the Massachusetts College of Pharmacy in Boston, where his father is a professor — allegedly conspired with Ahmad Abousamra, who authorities say is now in Syria.

Mehanna, 27, is being held without bail until his next court appearance on Oct. 30.

"I'm confident that the American people will put aside their fears and instead rely on the fairness guaranteed by our Constitution," said his attorney, J.W. Carney Jr. "Mr. Mehanna is entitled to that."

Rola Yaghmour, 20, of Shrewsbury and her family are friends with the Mehannas and she said she couldn't believe the new charges against Mehanna, calling him a "good man."

"He's not going to go crazy in a mall. There's no way he would do something like that," she said. "I read it and I was laughing, and I was like, 'They have to be kidding.' Because there's no way he would do something like that. It makes no sense. I was in shock. That's not like him at all nor his family, nothing of them at all."

Mehanna first was arrested in November and charged with lying to the FBI in December 2006 when asked the whereabouts of Daniel Maldonado, who is now serving a 10-year prison sentence for training with al-Qaida to overthrow the Somali government.

Authorities said Wednesday that Mehanna and his conspirators had contacted Maldonado about getting automatic weapons for their planned mall attacks, but he told them he could only get handguns.

Court documents filed by the government say that in 2002, Abousamra became frustrated after repeatedly being rejected to join terror groups in Pakistan — first Lashkar e Tayyiba, then the Taliban.

"Because Abousamra was an Arab (not Pakistani) the LeT camp would not accept him, and because of Abousamra's lack of experience, the Taliban camp would not accept him," Williams wrote in the affidavit.

Mehanna and Abousamra traveled to Yemen in 2004 in an attempt to join a terrorist training camp, according to court documents.

Mehanna allegedly told a friend, the third conspirator who is now cooperating with authorities, that their trip was a failure because they were unable to reach people affiliated with the camps.

Abousamra said he was rejected by a terror group when he sought training in Iraq because he was American, authorities said.

Sharia Law and the US Constitution

2009-10-15T17:00:00.000-07:00

This article has been re-printed from:

Islam In Action (http://islaminaction08.blogspot.com)
....and we thank you very much!!

Sharia Law and the US ConstitutionBy Louis Palme
Oct 14, 2009

Americans are among the most tolerant and patriotic people in the world. As a nation of immigrants, there is a certain appeal to the idea of multiculturalism where people of different backgrounds are accepted in our communities. Our nation was founded on the principles of equality and freedom, and we have invested our resources and blood over and over again to defend those principles. Our constitution guarantees not only the freedom of speech, but also the freedom to practice our religion of choice. So it is not surprising that many Americans see Sharia Law as a Muslim religious prerogative which we should support or at least tolerate. Banks have rushed to provide Sharia-compliant banking, and public institutions like universities and airports have spent taxpayer dollars to help Muslims comply with their religious requirements, providing special foot-baths and prayer rooms for them.

If anyone speaks out against Sharia Law, there is often a strong reaction within the Muslim community. This month, Dalia Mogahed, President Obama’s advisor on Muslim affairs, complained on British television that the Western view of Sharia was “oversimplified” and misunderstood. While acknowledging that even Muslims associate Sharia with draconian criminal punishments and laws that seem unequal for women, she stated, “Part of the reason there is this perception of Sharia is because Sharia is not well understood and Islam as a faith is not well understood.” The London-based Islam Channel panel she was on made repeated attacks against secular “man-made Law” and the West’s “lethal cocktail of liberty and capitalism.” Ms. Mogahed described her government role as “to convey . . to the President and other public officials what it is Muslims want.”

(Source)http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/barackobama/6274387/Obama-adviser-says-Sharia-Law-is-misunderstood.html

A similar reaction took place in a recent US Congressional hearing on the dangers posed by political Islam. Dr. Zuhdi Jasser, one of the most prominent Muslim reformers in the United States, testified, “I think if Muslims want credibility and we want to be respected equally, we need to stand for reform within our faith of [Sharia] laws that are still in the 15th and 16th Century.” He explained that the jihadists will not be defeated until Muslims start to recognize that their ideology is on a slippery slope toward radicalism. In response to this testimony, Muslim Congressman Keith Ellison (D, Mn) delivered a verbal tirade that accused Dr. Jasser of encouraging anti-Muslim bigotry and attempting to censor Islamists. Ellison said to Dr. Jasser, “I think you give people license for bigotry. I think people who engage in nothing less than Muslim-hating really love you a lot because you give them freedom to do that. You say, ‘yeah, go get after them.’ . . Now is somebody going to snatch my 13-year-old daughter’s hijab off, call her a horrible name, and spit on her because of something you said, Dr. Jasser? I worry about that.”

(Source )http://www.investigativeproject.org/1448/jasser-challenges-congressman-on-reforms-value

So, to better understand whether Sharia Law is desirable (or even legal) in the United States, it might be instructive to compare it with the US Constitution. This isn’t too difficult for the layman because the US Constitution is only 17 pages long, including its 27 amendments. Sharia Law is well-documented in the 1,200 page Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law, “The Reliance of the Traveler” by Ahmad ibn Naqib al-Misri, and published in the United States by Amana Publications. While the original document dates to the late 14th Century, it has been updated in the 1990’s and bears the approval of the Fiqh Council of North America as well as the authoritative Al-Azhar Islamic Research Academy in Egypt. The introduction to this manual states, “The four Sunni schools of Islamic Law . . are identical in approximately 75 percent of the legal conclusions. . . [T]he authors of the present volume and their positions do represent the orthodox Muslim intellectual and spiritual heritage that has been the strength of the Community for over a thousand years . . to the present day.”

While this volume of Sharia Law is primarily about the religious practice of Islam, the 800 pages of the manual devoted to rules and regulations also include sections on Trade, Inheritance, Marriage (suitable partners, legal rights, custody), Divorce, and Justice which would fall under civil law in the United States. Those sections comprise 35% of the manual, and are among the most controversial because they impose draconian punishments, authorize jihad, and sanction discrimination on the basis of religion and gender.

The summary below highlights the serious disconnects between the provisions of the US Constitution and those of Sharia Law.

LEGISLATIVE POWERS

US Constitution

Article I - All legislative Powers shall be vested in the Congress.

Sharia Law

The source of legal rulings for all acts of those who are morally responsible is Allah. (a1.1) It is not a sin to comply with man-made laws that require buying auto insurance or having a photo ID because “the authorities are responsible for the sin, not the individual forced to comply.” (w42.3 and w50.4)

POWER TO DECLARE WAR

US Constitution

Section 8 – Powers of Congress include to levy taxes, to make laws, and to declare war.

Sharia Law
It is obligatory to obey the commands and interdictions of the caliph or his representative in everything that is lawful, even if he is unjust . . because the purpose of his authority is Islamic unity, which could not be realized if obeying him were not obligatory. (o25.5) The caliph or his representative have the duty of undertaking jihad if their territory borders on enemy lands, of dividing the spoils of battle, and of remitting a fifth for “deserving recipients.” (o25.9(8))
Jihad is obligatory for everyone when the enemy has surrounded the Muslims. (o9.3) It is permissible in jihad to cut down the enemy’s trees and destroy their dwellings. (o9.1)

PRESIDENT (CALIPH)

US Constitution

Article II, Section I -- Qualifications of a President – He must be a natural born citizen, thirty-five years old, and a resident for fourteen years. The President is elected by ballot by the people (via the Electors) and shall serve for no more than 2 four-year terms.

No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.

Sharia Law
A caliph must be a Muslim, a non-slave, a male, of the Quraysh tribe, etc. (o25.0)
The Caliph appoints a group to select his successor among themselves. There is no a term of office. However, the caliphate of someone who seizes power is considered valid, even though his act of usurpation is disobedience, in view of the danger from anarchy and strife that would otherwise ensue. (o25.4(3))
(Note: The Islamic Caliphate was disbanded the Turkish Parliament in 1924.)

REMOVAL OF GOVERNMENT OFFICERS

US Constitution

Section 4 – The President and all civil Officers of the United States shall be removed from office if found guilty of treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.

Sharia Law

(No provision for removal from office.)

LEGAL AUTHORITY

US Constitution

Article VI – This Constitution and the laws of the United States which shall be made under it shall be the supreme law of the land, and judges in every state shall be bound by them.

Senators and Representatives, legislative officers, all executive and judicial officers both of the United States and the several states shall be bound by a Oath or Affirmation to support the Constitution.

Sharia Law

The source of legal rulings for all acts of those who are morally responsible is Allah. (a1.1)

CIVIL AND RELIGIOUS RIGHTS

US Constitution

Amendment 1 – Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or the press, or the right of the people to peaceably assemble, and to petition the Government for redress of grievances.

Sharia Law

Non-Muslims are obliged to comply with Islamic rules that pertain to the safety and indemnity of life, reputation, and property. Non-Muslims are forbidden to openly display wine or pork, recite their scriptures, or make a public display of feast days or funerals. Non-Muslims are forbidden to build new churches. A non-Muslim may not enter a mosque without permission. The protection for non-Muslims is withdrawn if a non-Muslim commits adultery with a Muslim woman or marries her, leads a Muslim away from Islam, kills a Muslim, or says anything derogatory about Allah, the Prophet, or Islam. (o11.5 through o11.10)

US Constitution

Amendment 2 – The right of people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Sharia Law

It is a condition that someone buying weapons be of a people who are not at war with Muslims. (k1.2(f))
Enormities (sins) include selling weapons to non-Muslims who will use them against us. (w52.1(192))

US Constitution

Amendment 3 – No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner prescribed by law.

Sharia Law

(Not covered.) However, the Pact of Omar (636 AD) imposed on Christians in Syria, “We shall keep our gates wide open for passersby and travelers. We shall give board and lodging to all Muslims who pass our way for three days.”

US Constitution

Amendments 4 – 8 – These amendments prohibit unreasonable searches, require due process according to the law, provide for confrontation of witnesses, impose jury trial on all matters involving over $20, and prohibit excessive fines and cruel and unusual punishments. Amendment 14 provides for equal protection of the laws for all citizens.

Sharia Law

No testimony may be made by people who have lowly jobs, such as a street sweeper or a bath house attendant, or non-Muslim. (o24.2-3)

Testimony regarding fornication or sodomy requires four male eye-witnesses to the act. (o24.9)

A woman’s testimony is worth only half that of a man. (o24.10)

(There is no provision for a jury trial under Sharia Law.)

Cruel and unusual Islamic punishments include 1) stoning for adultery (o12.2); 2) scourging 40 lashes with hands, shoes, ends of clothes, or a whip for drunkenness (o16.3); 3) severing the right hand for theft of over $36 and the left foot for a repeat offense (o14.1); and 4) death for apostasy from Islam. (o8.2)

Indemnity for accidentally killing a male Muslim is 100 camels or 4,235 grams of gold. (Current value: $144,000.) Indemnity for killing a woman is half that of a man, for killing a Jew or a Christian is one-third of the indemnity paid for a Muslim. The indemnity paid for a killing Zoroastrian is one-fifteenth of that of a Muslim. The indemnity for causing a miscarriage is one slave. (o4.9)

There is no indemnity for a killing a non-Muslim at war with Muslims, an apostate, or someone sentenced to death by stoning. (o14.17)

Jews and Christians are subject to a “poll tax” not less than 1 dinar (Current value: $144) per adult male per year. No maximum is stipulated. (o11.4) This is a penalty for remaining in their ancestral religion instead of embracing the “religion of truth.” (o9.8)

A husband may beat a “rebellious” wife for 1) not allowing immediate sexual intercourse when he asks for it, at home, and if she can physically endure it; 2) answering him coldly; or 3) being averse when she was previously kind. (m5.1 and m10.12) The only limitation is that he may not break her bones, wound her, or cause bleeding.

US Constitution

Amendment 13 Slavery and involuntary servitude are abolished.

Sharia Law

The section on Slavery (k32.0) is not translated into English. The provisions remain in Arabic. The editor of “The Reliance of the Traveler” claims that these provisions are no longer applicable, yet they remain in there in the text of Sharia Law. Elsewhere, the manual states, “Originally the status of slave was simply the outcome of having been taken as a prisoner of war. A captive who could not buy his own freedom by means of ransom remained in the possession of the captor until he had earned his freedom by work or until he was granted liberty by his master.” (w13.1)

US Constitution

Amendment 21 repealed “prohibition,” thereby allowing manufacture, sale, and transport of alcoholic beverages.

Sharia Law

It is unlawful to sell grapes to someone who will make wine from them. (k4.9) “Allah cursed whoever drinks wine, gives it to others to drink, sells it, buys it, presses it for another, transports it, receives it, or eats its price.”

Enormities (sins) include drinking wine in any form or other intoxicant, even if only a drop as in medicine; pressing out the juice to make wine or other intoxicant; carrying it for purposes of drinking, or having it carried; serving it to others or having it served; selling it; buying it; having it bought or sold; consuming proceeds from selling it; or keeping wine or other intoxicant. (o16.6 and w52.1(350-361))

So, the next time someone suggests that we should be more understanding of Sharia Law, it would be fair to ask him/her what parts of our US Constitution would he/she be willing to abandon in order to accommodate Sharia Law.

Conversation with an Islamic Idiot on Youtube

2009-10-13T09:27:00.000-07:00

Here is what the average non-muslim person gets into, when they try to ask questions to a muslim. Youtube is known for extremists and islamic excusers, and here is a good example:

BBJ:
Why don't muslims speak out against Radical Islamists?

TaberLionsDad:
Yo"BIackbootJack" Muslims all over the world speak against radical element's in their society. But its just not good enough for the Zionist machine (oooops) who want's blood. Actually western powers and my friend "Z" they really want a pre-text to go into Iraq etc etc in the name of freedom and steal all the oil while at it. Its not in their interest to see a Islam that is not "violent" hence you-tube videos like this completely designed to get an angry reaction with no intellectual basis.

BBJ:
How come we have never heard of any muslims standing up and denouncing violence?
Are you saying that Islamic media is afraid to publicize it?

TaberLionsDad:
What's interesting "BIackbootJack" is that all the Muslim countries that have lot of natural resources become top priority for the west to go and implement democracy whilst In Africa there was genocide but the west was not interested. The est knowingly put Saddam in power a known nutcase so that they will have to return to get him out of power and and at the same time steal all the oil?!?!Binladen as taught his views in Saudi, but America not a word against them, oil my friend oil!!?!!??!

BBJ:
Last I remember, the West does not "steal" oil. They buy it. Its a business.
But lets stay on that....If America gives BILLIONS of dollars to Arabic oil sources, why are most of the muslim people, poor and have little or no chance of wealth?

TaberLionsDad:
Muslims are generally well off!!!.....are you talking crap again "BIackbootJack" stop talking crap...anyway what is that to do with anything?!?!?! are u trying to make some sort of a connection with ur limited edition IQ power.

BBJ:
Everytime I see people in Islamic countries, all they do is walk the streets. Anyways, heres question number two:
Is it a prerequsite to hate the Jews if you are a muslim? IS it a law or something?

TaberLionsDad:
(silence)

BBJ:
c'mon...I don't have all day.

TaberLionsDad:
(crickets are chirping here)

BBJ:
taberliondad...is it safe to say..you ran away?

TaberLionsdad:
(more silence)

BBJ:
(watching FOX News...staring at the ceiling...rolling my eyes....)

TaberlionsDad:
(still more silence)

BBJ:
ZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzz.........

= TWO HOURS LATER-

TaberLionsDad:
Yo"BIackbootJack" i'm back!!! son!!! i was a bit busy,was with your ..? well lets not say it here.

No!! Muslims don't hate Jews per say. But if someone is looting your house, demolishing your homes, making your life hell, its only normal to have ill feelings towards them, were only humans. But!!! we shouldn't stereotype what the 99.99% of jews are doing in Israel. In short I like a good Jew vise versa..

BBJ:
oh c'mon man! i already published it...do I have to go back and re-open?

TaberLionsDad:
(answering another poster named Brdstfff)
No "Brdstfff" if we stop the oil you will be on your knees!!! We haev enough money to buy from any other country like the Japanese. And b4 you say i, NO!!! the oil will last forever!!!

BBJ:
what do you mean by "we"....do you control the oil? Are you one of the islamic counbtry leaders?
They will never shut off oil...they need the American money to keep their whores and mistress in line...while their people walk the street and starve, looking for jobs that don't exist

TaberLionsDad:
C'mon my ass "BIackbootJack" you two timing fagit, you've edited our conversation and tried to make me look bad. I went on your blogger, man you are indeeeed!! saaaad!!! I mean do you really spend all that time just to express your hate towards all the Muslims. You hate all 1.6billion Muslims. In your sick head do you think just one muslim may be a good human!?!?

BBJ:
I edited NOTHING you shit head!! It is copied and pasted just the way you said it!
Damn liar! Can't face the facts can you ?

TaberLionsDad:
I'm no country leader but i own a Ferrari and a Aston Martin, my uncle is in the oil business?!?! Anyways, Yes some of the leaders in Muslim countries are bad and its sad that their people are waking on the street with a beak future. But what's more sad that a retard like "BIackbootJack" understands that but yet you hate all 1.6billion Muslims, including the poor ones on street, who are what they are only cos thats all they knew. your sick maan!?!?

BBJ:
Well...if thats all they know..and they have nothing...why aren't you donating your very wealthy petro-dollars to help them get jobs and keep them from starving?
Is it that you don't want to part with your "Aston Martin" or your Ferrari"?
In your last comment you said " If WE shut off the oil"...aren't you supposed to be an Islamic Nation of One?
Where is your sense of duty to your fellow muslims?

TaberLionsdad:
You my dear asshole "BIackbootJack" are the shit head!!! if people watching this site view down the list of comments say ten pages back they can see your sick, repulsive, provocative language that made me say the right things but in a little wrong way?!?!? RETARD!!!

BJ:
Now that is incorrect...i never did that, nor would I ever do that. You must be taking everything out of context....go back and answer my questions....I have a blog to maintain...
come on...chop chop...move it.

TaberLionsdad:
I use to have 7 Ferrari's and 3 Aston Martins. I gave them up and spent the money on the poor. Also produced literature to distribute to the world creating awareness of the state terrorism by the Zionist oppression of the innocent people of palestine (not Hamas). I also helped George Galloway to make clear to the world what the Zionist are doing. And we are one!!!

BBJ:
Uh Huh...Well...thats all very good....
I am so glad to hear that...

Makes me think back to the time I was talking to Bill Gates of Microsoft along with Bill Clinton, Idi Amin, and Glenn Beck on how to help the starving in Africa.
Did I mention I had 10 Jaguars, 5 BMW's, and 17 Rolls Royce?
But I sold them to help the starving poor in Wakapookastan
Anyways..back to our chat...
Would you mind answering the questions I asked?

TaberLionsDad:
Yo"BIackbootJack" is true that down below when you exceed the commenting limit and you have to put in the text in the field, it takes you about 12 attempts cos of your IQ level??!?

BBJ:
not really....it takes me awhile because I am posting our chat on my blog at the same time...
keep up the good work.
answer my questions please.

TaberLionsDad:
Listen! "BIackbootJack" i can't be here chatting to you forever, and as a born-retard you hardly make any intellectual points anyway. I'll let you in on a secret. Everytime i go for a poop i made it my business to take my laptop to respond to your comments?! i picture you better while pooping. Ever since i've met you i've been pooping more than usual!?!
Your killing me man, C'mon!! there's a limit, i can't be shitting with you ....sorry i mean chatting with you all day.

BBJ:
Oh so you admit Islam is full of shit!! As if we didn't know...
Anyways..I see you did answer my questions before...next question:
Why do the Islamic terrorists follow the Koran to the letter?

TaberLionsDad:
Wakapookastan, is that where your mum and dad are from!!!

......Hey!! that sounds like Pakistan!!! ..You racist redneck bigot....it;s a variation of that word "pakistan" twisted in your sick mind!!!

u just said couple of comment's ago that pakistan is good!! and now this indirect racist remark!!! sick ass liar!!!

BBJ:
Hey!! Don't call me a liar, you....you...you...wife beater!!

Anyways..back to our very civilized conversation....

again, if you please..Why do the ISLAMIC MUSLIM Terrorists follow the Koran to the letter?

TaberLionsDad:
Yo "BIackbootJack" i can't answer your question cos i can't concentrate!!! the shitting and now this "yurgy1" character who can't communicate in english anyways has started to talk some other shit!!! tell him to piss off and then i'll answer your question.

BBJ:
Awwww...forget it...
I have to hit the toilet anyways.

TaberLionsDad:
Chicken shit!!!

A Warning From A Sheriff About What Could Come Next

2009-09-16T15:49:00.001-07:00

I wanted to share this with everyone. PLEASE read it through and comment.

"

From a friend in San Diego,

To all my friends - Deputy and Civilian alike: - - -

A fellow Deputy passed this on to members of our Department...I have

taken the same training that he refers to in his letter. I do agree

that schools & children are their next focus. Please read his entire

memo – I believe you will find it very interesting. The attached slide

show has some amazing photos from 911 from the air. When viewing you

must click to advance each of the pictures.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

On This September 11, 2009

This is an open letter from San Diego Sheriff’s Deputy to his unit. I

thought you might find it worthwhile.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

On this anniversary of the attack on our nation, I ask that you reflect

on a few things. The attack killed approximately as many of our

countrymen as did the attack on Pearl Harbor. The military has

continued to prosecute the "war on terror", although with questionable

support from congress and waning interest from the American people.

Where is the outrage, the resolve, the unity of our populace?

Far more Americans can name the American Idol finalists than can name the #2 in

command of al-Qaeda. Politicians lie, waffle, or fold like a house of

cards rather than leading. However, there is one man we can trust. He

hasn't lied to us yet. Any promise he has made he is either planning

to keep, has already accomplished, or made a serious effort to do so.

We would do well to trust in what he says. To whom do I refer? The

man is Osama bin Laden.

Unlike American politicians elected by a

mindless and/or self centered electorate in little more than popularity

contests, OBL's reputation and continued power depends upon him keeping

his word. I firmly believe that he will do his utmost to continue to

keep his word.

When I've done terrorism training within the department and as an

outside contractor, I've been asked many times what does al-Qaeda have

in store for America next? I answered that no one knows that for sure,

but we would do well to examine what they have done elsewhere and what

they have said they will do. Both points have been strong indicators

of their intentions. With that in mind, I suggest they have at least

one course of action in the planning stages. Al-Qaeda knows that

children are near and dear to the American psyche.

Consider the following points, overlooked or minimized by the mainstream media:

Videotapes confiscated in Afghanistan showing al-Qaeda terrorists

training to takeover a school.

*

An Iraqi national with known terrorist connections caught with a

computer disk containing information detailing Department of

Education crisis planning for U.S school districts.

*

Two Saudi men - one wearing a black trench coat despite the Florida

heat -- terrifying a busload of Tampa schoolchildren by boarding a

school bus and remaining for the entire ride to school, all the while

laughing and speaking Arabic.

*

A March FBI/DHS bulletin noting "recent suspicious activity" by

foreigners who drive school buses, are licensed to drive them, or have

actually managed to purchase them right here at home.

*

(the next few are VERY scary - BlackbootJack)

*

Members of "unnamed extremist groups" (al-Qaeda affiliates) who have

obtained commercial drivers licenses with school bus endorsements.

*

Osama bin Laden's promise that the 2004 terrorist attack at Beslan will

happen many times over in the United States.

*

Al-Qaeda spokesman Suleiman Abu Gheith‘s declaration of al-Qaeda's "right" to kill 2 million American children.

*

Most Americans have a short attention span, which is only exacerbated

by the media. An event that happened eight years ago is nearly ancient

history to them. However, the radical Islamists never forget and they

work on a timeline of centuries. When Saladin captured Jerusalem in

1187 it was the culmination of a struggle that had its root in the 7th

century. Whether it is al-Qaeda, the Taliban, Jemaah Islamiya,

Al-Shabaab, or any other of their ilk, their goal is the death of the

West and the reinstatement of the Islamic caliphate - worldwide rule.

When I heard the Colonel give a presentation on the terrorist threat to

America's school children, he quoted a Marine headed to Afghanistan who

responded as to what cops could do for him. He said. "I've got your

12, you watch my six. Do your job." He asked us to keep his kids and

his family safe. This may raise the question, "But I'm only one cop.

What can I do?" It was one off duty cop that pinned down the active

shooter in the Utah mall until he could be neutralized. It was one

security officer that stopped the shooter at the El Al terminal at LAX.

It was one border officer that interdicted Ahmed Ressam at Port

Angeles, Washington on his way to bomb LAX.

If you do not mentally rehearse crisis response, if you do not remain

aware of your surroundings in all situations, if you do not stay

proficient with the weapons you have been entrusted to use, then you

are not fully doing your job. I encourage you to rethink and change

that. Never forget September 11. Honor our fellow Americans who died

and our troops who continue the fight. Honor them by being ready to

protect their children and families. Honor them by watching their six.

If or when you are faced with the need to act, who knows but that you

were born to such a time as this.

Signed,

A fellow member of the San Diego Sheriff’s Department Team

Team:

Just another side note:

American Law protects ANYONE from a lawsuit if that person reports suspicious activity in the public.

In other words....if you report suspicious actvity, you are free from those under suspicion placing a law suit on you. - BBJ

--

An Interview With Ali Sina - The man behind Faithfreedom.org

2009-08-30T16:56:00.000-07:00

An Interview With Ali Sina - The man behind Faithfreedom.org

ITF:
First of all I would like to thank you for taking the time to speak to the viewers of the Infidel Task Force.
It is quite an honor to have you here.

Sina:
Thank you. It is my pleasure.

ITF: Currently the world has 44 different ongoing conflicts with radical Islamic militants. What brought us to this point? Where will it lead to? And how do we stop them?

Sina:
Conflict is not new to Islam. Through fighting and violence Muslims resolve their differences. Will you believe if I tell you that the Muslim god prescribes fighting to his believers?

Quran 2.216 - "Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But God knoweth, and ye know not.

Since 1492, when Ferdinand and Isabella completed the reconquista of Spain and forced the Muslims out of Granada the expansionist zeal of Muslims came to a halt. Muslims are required to make peace when they are weak and break their peace accords when they are strong. This is based on the example set by Muhammad in Hudaibiyyah, where he, realizing the weakness of his army, signed a ten year peace treaty with the Meccans, only to break that treaty, by divine decree, two years later, when he had conquered other weaker citadels and had become powerful. To justify this treacherous act he made his Allah reveal the sura 9 entitled Bara’a (deliverance) and deliver him from his obligation to honor his treaty.

Quran. 9:3: And an announcement from Allah and His Messenger, to the people (assembled) on the day of the Great Pilgrimage¯ that Allah and His Messenger dissolve (their treaty) obligations with the pagans.
Imam Suyuti, in Itqan Fi 'Ulum al- Qur'an (Certainty in the science of the Quran) wrote:

The command to fight the infidels was delayed until the Muslims become strong, but when they were weak they were commanded to endure and be patient. [Sobhy as_Saleh, Mabaheth Fi 'Ulum al- Qur'an, Dar al-'Ilm Lel-Malayeen, Beirut , 1983, p. 269.]
The reason that after 500 years of relative calm Jihad is back is because Muslims, thanks to the oil and the well paying jobs in the West, are feeling strong and think it is time to flex their religious muscles again.

So there is the answer to your first question: "What brought us to this point?" Muslims feel strong and hence they are under religious obligation to start fighting. What was the second question?

ITF: My second question is where will it lead to?

Sina:
That depends on how we respond to them. If we adopt a submissive peaceful posture vis-à-vis their aggression, of course they will be emboldened and we lose. We lose our freedom, our democracy, our civilization and everything humanity has achieved during these last few hundreds of years. Science will be enslaved by an obscurantist religion and the world will sink in the quagmire of Talibanization.

This will not be the end of the story. Since Muslims know no other way to resolve their disagreements, except through fighting, in an eventual Islamic world everyone will be fighting with everyone else and there will be mass slaughters worldwide. With the world’s reserves of nuclear weapons in the hands of Muslims, you can imagine what will be the future of mankind.

Muslims will start killing each other because each considers others to be heretics. A Good example is what is happening in Gaza. Muslims in this tiny piece of land are in perpetual war with Israel. Meanwhile, they persecute the Christians and have splinted in numerous groups, fighting among each other.
The main factions are al Fatah and al Hamas. They are busy killing one another. Then there are:

Jaish al-Islam: Affiliated with al-Qaida.

Fatah al-Islam: run by Saliman Abu Lafi and Raffik Abu Aker;

Jaish al-Ummah: controlled by Ismail Hammed.

Jaish Allah, al-Takfir.

Lion's Den of Jihad Fighters,

Jaljalat (an Arabic term meaning "rolling thunder").

Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade: Responsible for shootings, suicide operations including female suicide bombing.
Holy Jihad Brigades: Responsible for the August 2006 kidnappings of Fox News reporter Steve Centanni and cameraman Olaf Whig in the Gaza Strip.

Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades: The militant wing of Hamas,

Palestine Islamic Jihad: Committed to destroying Israel through holy war.

Al-Quds Brigades: The militant wing of Palestinian Islamic Jihad.

Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine: A Marxist-rooted revolutionary group.

Palestine Liberation Front: Responsible for hijacking the Italian cruise ship Achille Lauro on Oct. 7, 1985, and killing a wheelchair bound elderly Jewish American, Leon Klinghoffer, and throwing is body and his wheelchair overboard.

Abu Ali Mustapha Brigades: The military wing of the Marxist-secular Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine.
Popular Resistance Committees: Founded by Hezbollah of Lebanon, is an umbrella organization for militants coming from Fatah and joining forces with Hamas-linked groups.

There are many more, and this is just in Gaza. There are thousands of groups in the entire Muslim world that are hostile to each other, fighting and killing one another and calling each other kafir, unislamic and heretic, but united in their hatred of non-Muslims and particularly the Jews.

If Islam conquers the world, this is where we are heading: Constant war and the assured destruction of mankind.

Now, this may come as a surprise but this division between Muslims is all by design. It is as if Muhammad wanted to spread hatred and disunity among his followers and make them kill one another. Muslims will jump to differ and will quote the surah 3:103 where Muhammad exhorts his followers: "And hold fast, all of you together, to the rope of Allah and be not divided." However, he laid the foundation for the disunity of his followers. Here is how:
Imam Abu Dawood quoted a Hadith concerning the division of the Muslims into seventy-three sects in his Sunan (3/4580, English edn):

Mu'awiyah ibn Abi Sufyan said, The Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) stood among us and said': 'Beware! The People of the Book before (you) were split up into 72 sects, and this community will be split up into 73, seventy-two of them will go to Hell and one of them will go to Paradise.'

This hadith is reported also by others. So Muslims believe it is authentic. The implication is clear. It follows that Muslims will split into many sects and since all but one are false, all but one are heretics and will go to hell. How the righteous Muslims should deal with heretics? That too is prescribed. Heretics must be killed. Muhammad said those who change the religion should be put to death.
Now, the question is which one of these 73 sects is the right one? That depends on whom you ask. Naturally, all Muslims believe they are the guided ones. So if every Muslim believes to be rightly guided and those who disagree with his interpretation of Islam are heretics, doesn’t it follow that Muslims are required to fight with each other?

The truth is that Islam is not divided into 73 sects but into thousands of sects.

I am a rationalist. I do not believe in supernatural. But for the sake of argument, let us assume Satan is real and hell bond to destroy mankind. What better way could he find than inventing a religion like Islam and making people kill one another to the last man?

ITF And, how do we stop them?

Sina:
There is only one realistic way: Stop Islam. This is a lot easier than people think. Islam is a lie. All we have to do is expose this lie and Muslims will walk away from it. No one wants to believe in a lie. Once we show Muslims that Muhammad was a psychopath cult leader and that all his claims are bogus, Islam will become a dead religion in no time. I believe in the power of truth. Tell the truth and Islam will be destroyed in our own lifetime.

ITF Will it not offend their sensitivity?

Sina:
To hell with their sensitivity! Tell the truth and save their lives.

ITF: Canada and America both have seen a rise in domestic terror cells. Jamat ul-Fuqra, Hizb-ut-Tahrir, just to name two! They operate openly and with peaceful identities. What are they in reality and why are the governments reluctant to approach them?

Sina:
All Muslim groups are terrorists. This does not mean every Muslim is a terrorist. But if someone launches an Islamic group, under any pretext, whether peaceful of not, be careful of his intentions. Muslims fight for the same cause, the domination of Islam and the overthrow of the secular governments. Their modus operandi is different. Some opt direct fighting and others covert fighting.

Last February, A Pakistani American, who started a Muslim TV channel in the US to counter negative portrayal of Islam after the 9/11 terror attacks, beheaded his estranged wife in a very Islamic fashion. This man was clean shaven who wore suit and tie and was looking quite westernized and modernized.

A Muslim is a Muslim is a Muslim. Don’t let them confuse you with charades like "Islam is not a monolithic religion," or "honor killing is cultural," and other nonsense. A peaceful Muslim is a contradiction in terms. It is an oxymoron. Have you seen a hot ice? A peaceful Muslim makes even less sense. The very fact that they keep rehashing Islam is peaceful is because it is not.
Why we don’t use this adjective for any other religion? According to a Persian say, perfume is what smells good, not what the vender tells you.

Now, don’t get me wrong. I am not saying all Muslims are violent and terrorists. There are many good people who call themselves Muslims. They are the majority. But they are good to the extent that they diverge from Islam.

Jihad stands on two legs. One is terror and the other is deception or taqiyyah. Both are essential for the advancement of Islam. Which foot you put forward depends on the situation. When Muslims are weak, taqiyyah is the best approach and when they are strong, terror is prescribed. This is sunnah, the example set by Muhammad. He used both terror and deception to advance his cause.
There is a debate going on among Muslims about whether Islam is strong enough to engage in warfare or not enough strong and therefore Muslims should work their way through deception. Of course, debates in Islam are always bloody, but nonetheless we have to recognize that this is a debate a la Musulman.
A few years ago, Dr. Mahathir who was the prime minister of Malaysia hosted the summit of Organization of Islamic Conference, where leaders of all 57 Islamic countries attended. In his speech, delivered to all Muslims, he lamented that Islam has been associated with terrorism. He spoke of the past glory of Islam and after complaining that Muslims are oppressed and humiliated he encouraged them to put aside the fight, advance in science and technology and then, to do what? Acquire guns and rockets, bombs and warplanes, tanks and warships, and take over the world.
Dr. Mahathir was hailed as a moderate Muslim and by all accounts he is. So what is the difference between a moderate Muslim and a terrorist Muslim? The difference is that the latter thinks the time for Jihad has come while the former believes Muslims are too weak and they should wait until they become strong. In essence, Muslims cannot disagree with Jihad because they would be disagreeing with the Quran.
Jamat ul-Fuqra and Hizb-ut-Tahrir have the same goal that al Qaida has: Domination of Islam. The difference is in how they want to achieve this goal. One group wants to use terror and the other prefers deception.

ITF: Lets talk a bit about Shariah Law. Why do some Western countries allow Sharia Law to be implemented instead of telling Muslims they must live according to the laws already in place? I’m speaking of the case in point in the UK.

Sina:
Corruption my dear! Corruption of your politicians! Politicians want the votes of Muslims and they will sell their mother for it. A good example is the new scandal surrounding the release of the Lockerbie bomber, Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al Megrahi that involves the UK Prime Minister Brown.

The government of Britain made a mockery of justice and the memory of 300 people perished in that bombing when they released the terrorist Megrahi, to make a lucrative deal with Libya. This may surprise the British, but it does not surprise me. I am an Iranian. The British governments invariably have looked the other way and sacrificed the human rights in Iran to make lucrative deals with the dictators of that county, and turned against them when the deals went elsewhere. In 1953 they conspired to oust the democratic prime minister of Iran, Dr. Mossadeq, and reinstated the inexperienced and easily controllable Mohammad Reza Shah. Twenty six years later they turned against him and backed Khomeini and the tyrannical mullahs, when the Shah matured and did not like to be bossed by the British. Then for thirty years they supported one of the most brutal regimes in the world, knowing everything about the tortures, rapes in prisons, executions and all forms of human rights abuses in Iran. None of that mattered to the consecutive British governments. As long as the lucrative deals were coming, they turned a blind eye to all human rights abuses, until Russia and the China managed to win the mullahs to their side and the Brits were left in the cold. Now that the lucrative deals are gone, the British government is against the Islamic regime.

Shameless politicians will sell their wife and mother, not just their country, in order to stay in power. Muslims take full advantage of it to strengthen their foothold in western countries. You will be defeated because your politicians are traitors. It is time for a new generation of politicians to rise – politicians who put their country first, defend its laws, its constitution, its democratic values and its heritage. But this new breed will only rise when people support them. This consciousness must arise from the people. For decades the western mind has been contaminated with leftist propaganda and now we are seeing the result. Islamism is expanding and the western civilization is disintegrating.

We have one man in Europe who stands for Europe. He is Geert Wilder. Behold how the European leftist media vilifies him and equates him to Hitler. Remember how the unforgettable Oriana Fallaci, who stood for the west and its Judeo-Christian heritage, was treated by the courts in her own country, Italy.

You have a disease within your countries. It is called liberalism. It produces a toxin known as political correctness, and a venom called multiculturalism that poison your entire society. This disease affects your immune system and makes you vulnerable to your external and internal enemies. It has infected to all democratic countries, from India to Europe and now it has spread to the US affecting its very heart.

If you want to defend your country from Islamization, you have to flush out your system from liberalism. You need to take the power away from those who are selling out your country and vote for patriotic servants of the people who are not afraid to call a spade a spade and do not fear to stand up against Muslims and fight back their effort to Islamize the country.

The sharia must be outlawed because it is not just anti constitutionals but also anti human. It is a violation of human rights.

Construction of mosques must be outlawed. Mosques are places where Muslims are indoctrinated to hate their fellow non-Muslim citizens. Banning the construction of mosques is in conformity with Islam. Muslims do not allow building Hindu temples, churches or any other non Muslim house of worship in their Islamic countries. See this report.

Why should we allow a religion to grow in our country when we know that if they come to power they will take our freedom away from us?

Then you have to start a campaign to inform people about Islam and to rescue those trapped in this gigantic web of deception. I am not saying that governments should do this, but they should not stand in the way of those who want to use their right of free speech and threaten them with penalties.

Once Muslims leave Islam they can be as trustworthy and patriotic as anyone else. As long as they are Muslims you have to watch their every move with suspicion. Muslims’ loyalty is not to their country, but to Islam. They have a duty to destroy the non-Muslim systems and establish the Khilafat.

The problem is that the non-Muslims do not know they are under attack. They are blinded by political correctness and rendered unconscious by multiculturalism. They will wake up from their coma when it is too late. In some European countries, like in UK, it may already be too late. Maybe it is their karma.

ITF: Shariah law is contradictory to our Democratic governments, and from what we know, the majority of Muslim women do not want the introduction of Shariah law within Canada and the US. Are these the major stumbling blocks that are currently preventing Muslims from implementing Shariah Law here?

Sina:
Yes that is very much true. Muslim women know that under Sharia law they will lose their rights as humans. The truth is that most Muslims do not want to live under Sharia. They are caught in a tug of war, a cognitive dissonance, between their faith and how they really want to live. However, these people can be easily manipulated by the extremists and turn fully fledged Islamists and even terrorists. Faith is a dangerous thing. It makes you do things against your own conscience and interest. If you want to stop the Sharia law in the west you have to attack Islam and make Muslims realize that it is a lie.

ITF: Will the US court system provide, in any way, an entrance to implementation of Shariah Law?

Sina:
The Sharia is unconstitutional. So how the courts could agree to have a two tier law, one for Muslims and one for the rest of Americans? This is something that unscrupulous politicians may do. It is much easier to manipulate corrupt politicians with the promise of massive Muslim votes than bribe a judge. Right now America has a very corrupt government who is paving the road for the Islamization of this country.

ITF: It seems if there is going to be any change with Islam, it will be with the Muslim women. At least that is what we have seen in the past few years. Do you think Muslim women would reject Islam if they were allowed the freedom to do so?

Sina:
Yes I agree that the real change will come from Muslim women. This is quite obvious by watching the videos coming out of Iran. You see women are at the forefront of the demonstrations. They have nothing to lose and are ready to give their lives for their freedom. In the west you see courageous women like Nonie Darish, Wafa Sultan and Ayan Hisi Ali who are at the line of fire in our battle for freedom. In Egypt there is this amazing woman, Nagla Al-Imam, a graduate from Al Azhar University and an expert in the Sharia law who has openly converted to Christianity and has said she will not leave her country. Now this is courage. I really pray for her safety. This shows that you cannot keep a woman enslaved after she is educated. The Taliban know that too. That is why they destroy the girl’s schools and kill their teachers.

ITF: Just about every conscious human in the free world knows about Islamic suicide bombers, train bombers, and night club bombers. Everyone knows that Muslims flying large commercial planes crashed into the World Trade Center buildings and the Pentagon on 9/11. Those are the actions of the obvious terrorist side of Islam. Yet, all the world hears is the plea from Muslims to understand that Islam is a religion of peace and love. If that is so, does this mean that Islamists who are terrorists use a Quran that is different from the "peaceful" Muslim's Quran?

Sina:
Yes that is true. There are two different Qurans. One is written and the other is imagined. The terrorists and the hate spewing mullahs read the written Quran. There are two dozens of sanitized versions of this Quran translated into English and despite the efforts of the translators, it still sounds pretty gory. The other Quran exists in the imagination of the masses of Muslims who have never read the written Quran and attribute everything good that they can think of to it.
It is my belief that once these Muslims learn the content of the written Quran, their dream will be shattered and they will leave Islam. This may take some time. The believer often goes through a period of denial, then through the stages of shock, guilt, confusion, depression and anger until he or she reaches the citadel of enlightenment and see themselves as apostates.

ITF: We want to wish you the best with your book, Understanding Muhammad. Do you feel that if people understood what kind of person Muhammad really was, that they would have a better understanding of Islam?

Sina:
Absolutely! To Understand Islam and hence Muslims, it is imperative to understand Muhammad. Islam is Muhammadanism. Muslims follow and emulate their prophet. Once you know Muhammad and his psychology, you’ll find Muslims are very predictable.

My book is unique in the sense that it probes into the mind of Muhammad and reveals his psychological makeup. There are thousands of stories narrated about Muhammad by his wives and companions. Collectively they reveal a very clear picture of Muhammad. Unlike Jesus, Moses and other prophets of the past, whose lives are shrouded in myths and legends, Muhammad’s life-story is recorded in detail. I analyzed him under the light of the modern psychology and I have shown that he suffered from a series of personality and mental disorders and that the entire phenomenon known as Islam is a mental case. Once you read the book, you’ll realize that Islam is an overgrown cult, no different from that of Jim Jones, David Koresh or even Charles Manson.
There are many books that show the evilness of Islam. All you have to do is read the Quran, the hadith and the sira, the biography of Muhammad, and you will see that Islam is very evil. But the question remains: How could something so evil become the second largest religion in the world and how could a man as depraved influence so many? Something is amiss. If Islam is so bad why can’t a billion people see it? Are we to suppose that there are no intelligent people among a billion Muslims? How could so many people, for so many generations, fail to see the obvious?

This is an important question, which weighs on Muslims, validates their faith and prevents them from questioning it. You have to explain this phenomenon if you want to wean them from Islam.

There is a mystery surmounting Islam and Muhammad. It is thanks to this mystery that Islam has survived so long. Understanding Muhammad demystifies him. Once Muhammad is demystified and the nakedness of the emperor becomes widely known, no one will believe in him. When the mystic is gone Islam will be gone.

All the Muslims who have read my book have left Islam. Those who did not leave did not read the book. How do I know that? They tell me. They write to say they read 10, 20 or 30 pages and the book is full of garbage and that they are not going to waste their time reading it. The book is not garbage, but they are afraid to read it because they see the effect that it has on them and they are terrified at the thought of doubting Islam. The fear of hell has paralyzed the Muslims mind.

ITF: Do you think it's possible to modernize Islam so that it can become compatible with the modern world?

Sina:
No. There can be no change in Islam. Any Muslim will tell you that. That is what Muhammad has warned against in many parts of the Quran.

(Quran .2:85)Do you, then, believe in some parts of the divine writ and deny the truth of other parts? What, then, could be the reward of those among you who do such things but ignominy in the life of this world? And, on the Day of Resurrection, they will be consigned to most grievous suffering. For God is not unmindful of what you do.

(Quran 6:114) "Am I, then, to look unto anyone but God for judgment [as to what is right and wrong], when it is He who has bestowed upon you from on high this divine writ, clearly spelling out the truth?"

For a more discussion on why Islam cannot modernize read my article on this subject. The Illusion of Reforming Islam.

There are individuals in the west that claim to be moderate Muslims and even against the Sharia. People must not fall for this charade. Sharia is Islam. You cannot be a Muslims and be against the Sharia. It is like saying I am a Christian but against the Bible. These people are neither cold nor hot. You know what Jesus would do with tepid people.
Muhammad was a thief, a pedophile a mass murderer, a rapist, a sadist torturer, and a conman charlatan. You either believe in him or you don’t. It is hypocritical to say, I am a follower of Muhammad, but not wicked enough to follow him completely, and in fact I am so good that I even oppose him.
The so called moderate Muslims are not the solution. They are the problem. They pull wool over the eyes of the unwary non-Muslims, making them believe Islam has a moderate side too, which is not true.
Many Muslims know nothing about Islam. They are moderate and good citizens. They can be excused. But those who are in televisions and radios, giving interviews and writing articles, are not ignorant about Islam. So what is their real agenda? I don’t know. I just don’t like deception. Truth must be said. And the truth is that Islam is evil and Muhammad was a cult leader. Period!
When Nazis ruled over Germany, many Germans were supporting them. Not all those Germans were evil. Most of them were ignorant. They did not know the truth about Nazis and Hitler. So you can forgive them. The same can be said about millions of Americans who voted for and still support Obama. They don’t know the destruction that this man is bringing on their country. But what would you say of a person who knows the truth about Hitler and then calls himself "a moderate Nazi?" There is something fishy, something does not add up with the claim of the self proclaimed moderate Muslims.

Stop paying attention to them. Stop publishing their articles, or inviting them to speak on behalf of the "moderate Islam," and they will go away. There is no such thing as moderate or peaceful Islam. Muslims are of two kinds. They are either terrorist Muslims or ignorant Muslims. The ignorant Muslims are, thanks heaven, the majority. Once they learn the truth about the real Islam they will leave it.
We want Muslims to leave Islam. We don’t want them to modernize it. That is not possible and we would be fooling ourselves into complacency, lowering our guards and making ourselves vulnerable to Islamic take over through deception.

ITF: Do you think radical Islam will proliferate under the new Obama administration?

Sina:
Radical Islam and Islam are not two different entities. Islam is radical.

The answer to your question is yes. Obama is doing everything to weaken the defense of America against its enemies, such as closing the Guantanamo Bay and prosecuting the CIA agents for waterboarding the terrorists to extract information that saved American lives. The terrorist will not attack now. Instead they will build their cells and will do incalculable damage at a later date.

Obama’s destruction of the economy will be catastrophic, but the harm that he is doing to the homeland security is equally calamitous.

Americans are seeing the danger that this snake oil salesman is posing. They are participating in tea party rallies, attending town hall meetings and are taking their country back. They are waking up (although not soon enough). Obama has been a catastrophe for America, but Americans are patriotic and they will not let his Marxist, Saul Alinsky and Bill Ayer disciple community organizer take their country to dogs.

ITF:
On behalf of the Infidel Task Force, I wish to thank you for taking the time to chat with us and giving us your point of view on Shariah Law, Radical Islam and what to do about the ongoing threat.
Thank You very Much.

Sina:
Thank you. It was my pleasure.

The New Muslim

2009-08-24T13:40:00.001-07:00

If islam, was truly a religion of peace. We would all be here extolling the virtues of said wonderful religion. Instead we are here to let everyone know that in reality, islam is a very violent, vicious, hating, and bloodthirsty cult.
Its as simple as that.
Everyday all over the world, muslims send us great examples of just how deadly islam is. From the USA to Africa.
From honor killing of apostates to slavery in the Saudi Repub.
Its time for real muslims to take stock of their religion.

muslims keep telling us , islam is peace. .
then we hear of bombings in Iraq.
islam is peace.
then we hear of raped detainees in Iran.
islam is peace.
and a bus is blown up killing 12.
islam is peace.
and a hotel is bombed killing 156.
Is islam really peace? that's not what devote muslims are showing us. Instead they say, those extremists are not real muslims.
Then are those extremists reading a different koran?
I don't think so. I think they are following it to the letter

Right now, this very day...there are 44 violent locations going on in the world. Some more severe then others. Most of these areas are in Africa.
Sudan, Darfur, Ehtiopia, Kenya, Nigeria, Somalia...and you know what they have in common?
everyone entails muslims fighting. that's right!!
All these areas of violence..and that is 44...are being done by devote islamists. Islamists that read the koran faithfully. They are not your average muslim, they are the ones causing trouble.

Muslims love to say:
"We are not violent. Read the Qu'ran for yourself to see. Its the Americans that are killing muslims."
Well, all we have to do is watch the media form all over the world. What is happening? Its muslim killing muslim. In Iraq, In Afghanistan, In almost every area in Africa. As to muslims are taking out the Jews too. Rockets fire into Israel almost daily.
So where is the United Nations on this? Where are they, when the muslims cause trouble?
Conveniently silent.

Well, as the free world sees it. Muslim extremists run the islam religion. And that is a shame. Because what this does, is just cause the regular average muslim, like those that expose the virtue of peace, on Youtube...to make excuses for their bloodthirsty brothers. Doing so they try to point the finger in every other direction but themselves.
That's why we always hear:
"its the Jews fault"
"Its Americas fault"
The finger is pointed elsewhere to try to get attention away from islam..

Blaming others to hide the violence of islam is a very old trick. But its not working anymore. All we have to do, is read the papers, listen to the news and watch the articles on the Internet.
The media is not making any of this up. All they do is report the news. And what they report about islam is pure evil and destruction.

9/11 did more for the demise of the stature of slam then anything ever reported.
I guess because of that, we have to thank those 19 radical extremists.

So anyways...that's islam in a nutshell.
As I said earlier, if islam was a religion of peace....we would not have all those web sites...
news articles...
documentaries...
movies....
books....
grassroots committees.....
or those 44 different wars involving muslims...

Islam's European Conquest: Is America Next?

2009-08-22T10:23:00.000-07:00

By John Griffing

Islamic lands that were occupied by the enemies will once again become Islamic...We proclaim that we will conquer Rome, like Constantinople was conquered once, and as it will be conquered again."
- Ali Al-Faqir, the Jordanian Minister for Religious Endowment

Britain, birthplace of parliamentary democracy, has fallen to Islam. Oxford, once home to the likes of C.S. Lewis, now houses a giant Eastern Islamic Studies Center. If this were the only Islamic addition to Oxford, the mood would be less somber, but when Oxford citizens are forced to awake every morning to the Muslim call to prayer with the full consent of the Church of England, nothing short of conquest has taken place.

Britain's Muslim demographic is now so dominant that the British government recently began to allow Islamic civil and religious law, known as Sharia, to be enforced along side British law.

But if religious tolerance is good, why is this a problem? Simple-this is not an issue of religious liberty. Islam is not designed to co-exist with western civilization. It is designed to conquer it.

Most would agree that Judeo-Christian values are consistent with Anglo-American tradition. Can the same be said of Islam? Even Muslims don't think so. The chief Justice of London's Sharia Court made this chilling statement:

If Sharia is implemented then you can turn this country into a haven of peace...Once a thief's hand is cut off, nobody is going to steal. Once an adulterer is stoned, nobody is going to commit this crime at all. This is why we say we want to offer it to British society.

Statements like this have not stopped prominent British figures from endorsing Sharia. The Archbishop of Canterbury, the Protestant equivalent of the Pope, called Sharia "unavoidable."

Under Sharia, non-Muslims are forbidden to even criticize Islam. This is significant, considering that a Policy Exchange Poll found that forty percent of British Muslims prefer to be governed by Sharia. Thirty-six percent believe that "apostates" from Islam should be punished by death. A Guardian Poll indicates that a sizeable number of British Muslims favor terrorist attacks on the United States and even England.[1]

There are presently 85 Sharia courts all across Britain, and, although initial defenders of the transformation claimed that Sharia courts would only exercise authority when consistent with British law, recent developments indicate that Muslims want Sharia pushed still further. Many Muslims advocate a separate police force due to the repeated embarrassment of rampant "honor killings."

Honor killings represent a new and growing form of homicide in many European countries, whereby Muslim families collaborate to kill fellow family members to restore honor. This practice is not alien to the US. Recently, a US Muslim man beheaded his wife, confessed to authorities, and still received a scheduled award from the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR).

Britain is not alone in its Muslim plight. In 2005, France experienced massive Muslim riots in 300 cities. Public buildings were firebombed, 200 policemen were injured, and 4,000 were arrested.[2] This is not unusual as a Muslim response to perceived offenses. Remember the Danish cartoons?

The central problem is assimilation. Most Muslims don't move to a country with the purpose of becoming real citizens of that country. Muslims don't want to be British or French. Muslims come for the wealth of the west, and to make the west Muslim. The evidence is transparent to anyone paying attention. The Parisian riots of 2005 were committed by second and third generation children of Muslim immigrants.

The ultimate aspiration of Muslims is total, global dominion within a theocracy known as a "caliphate." Be they peaceful Muslims or radical Muslims, all share in this goal.

And, incredibly, we cooperate with this reverse assimilation. Somehow we Westerners now feel compelled to assimilate with Muslims instead of expecting the reverse. Paris fashion runways have even begun designing and modeling "Muslim inspired head wraps and...tunics splattered with simulated blood in what some fashionistas dubbed carnage couture."[3]

The problem of Muslim integration is so sensitive that 751 areas have been willingly ceded to Islamic residents by the French government. Called "no-go zones" by many, these areas are off-limits to non-Muslims who value their lives. The UK is home to an indistinguishable number of "no-go zones," with violence toward non-Muslims increasing in once peaceful areas.

Dutch Muslims have such a grip on Holland that those who speak out must live in safe houses, like Dutch parliamentarian Geert Wilders. Yet the Dutch Minister of Justice still wants to make full Sharia an option on the next ballot, which would make Holland the first fully Islamic theocracy in the heart of Europe.

Germany could be next. Matthias Rohe, Judge on the Court of Appeals in Nuremburg wants to see full Sharia in Germany, saying, "we are ready to accept these kind of differences and would apply the norms." Many areas of Germany are now off limits to police and other uniformed personnel, as in France and the UK.

Muslim majorities will soon be a reality. By 2050, one out of every three people in Europe will be age 60 and over. The UN's Populations Division estimates that by 2050, if current birth rates are held, Europe will shrink by 200 million as a new Muslim majority dawns.

And now, onto this stage strides President Barack Hussein Obama, who advocates the European model for all aspects of American life; for the economy, for healthcare, and now, in our dealings with Muslims. We know where that road leads. It has been travelled by an entire continent now doomed to cultural and economic destruction.

Is this what we want? Do we really want European civilization, cultivated for centuries, to suddenly vanish? Do we really want American culture to disappear?

President Obama travels the world apologizing for America's very existence. He redefines Islam's historical goal as one of peaceful coexistence, its moral ethos as one of "tolerance and the dignity of all human beings," despite the evidence to the contrary. He pledges that the US "never will be-at war with Islam," blindly ignoring the present strategic situation. He claims that we are the "biggest Muslim country in the world," despite the fact that 80 percent of Americans say they are Christian.

The US has steadily been bowing to Islamic pressure. Many US banks and investment firms have formally adopted Sharia Finance. Harold Koh, recent Dean of Yale Law School and current Obama Advisor to the Secretary of State, openly talks about the compatibility of Sharia with American legal precedent.

What is our fascination with Islam? Why are we so willing to capitulate to its aims without resistance? Can't western civilization continue to champion religious liberty without committing suicide?

Radical Islam is inconsistent with American ideals, plain and simple. No two ideologies that embrace concepts so divergent as global domination and freedom can hope to coexist. There can be no compromise.

Europe is among the walking dead; their future is an Islamic one. America, however, still has a choice if we have the courage to make it.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[1] Tony Blankley, The West's Last Chance: Will We Win the Battle of Civilizations? (Washington, DC: Regnery, 2005), pp. 51, 55.

[2] Patrick J. Buchanan, State of Emergency: The Third World Invasion and Conquest of America, (New York: Thomas Dunne Books, 2006), 194.

[3] Molly Moore, "For the French Joie de Vivre Fades into Fear," Washington Post, 25 Mar. 2006, 1,13.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Clock Is Ticking Folks!!!

2009-08-07T10:02:00.000-07:00

Toronto's newest speaking star: a would-be suicide bomber
Terry Glavin, Special to the National Post

"Long live the Taliban" might seem an unlikely thing for a prominent anti-war figure to declare, but that's to-day's peace movement for you. Stranger still, the man who recently uttered those words, Azzam Tamimi, is being promoted by a new Toronto-based institute that says it is embarking upon a national campaign to cultivate wholesome, faith-based civic virtues among Canada's young Muslims.

The Mississauga, Ont.-based Al-Fauz Institute for Islamic Thought claims its purpose is to teach young Muslims how to apply Islamic ideas to Canada's pluralistic society and "prepare young minds that will take up the mantle of the Muslim community." But Tamimi -- who currently has top billing on the Al-Fauz website, and is listed as a member of the institute's "faculty" -- has loudly renounced democracy. Indeed, he recently proclaimed: "I don't believe in democracy anymore," explicitly praises suicide bombers, and says he is willing to blow himself up in Israel: "It's the straight way to pleasing my God and I would do it if I had the opportunity." He distinguishes good Muslims from their adversaries this way: "We love death. They love life."

You'd never know any of this from the billing the Al-Fauz Institute gives Tamimi. He's presented as a Palestinian-born British academic and a "political activist." His leading role with Britain's Stop The War Coalition is noted. But nowhere does the institute mention that Tamimi is also a high-ranking advisor to Hamas, an organization considered by Canada to be a terrorist group. His best-known book is titled Hamas: A History From Within. Nor is this fact mentioned by Toronto's Ryerson University, which is permitting Tamimi to deliver a four-day "intensive course on Islamic history" from July 24 to July 27.

Aside from Tamimi, five well-known Canadian imams are listed by the Al-Fauz Institute as "faculty" members. But the best known among them -- Hamid Slimi, chairman of the Canadian Council of Imams -- told me he'd never even heard of the institute. "I don't know anything about this," Slimi said. "I must be completely out of the loop."

Iqbal Masood Nadvi, the institute's "senior patron," denied any knowledge of Tamimi's dodgy associations or his various bloodcurdling pronouncements. "I am hearing this from you for the first time," he said. "I don't believe in the Taliban. What I know about Tamimi is he is an academic person."

Nadvi referred further questions to the Al-Fauz Institute's co-ordinator, Junaid Mirza, who had taken the lead in bringing Tamimi onboard. While Mirza was quite familiar with Tamimi's political background, he said it was Tamimi's academic expertise in the history of Islamic reform movements that landed him the institute faculty post and the Ryerson gig. But if the point is to present Canadians with "a balanced and comprehensive vision of Islam," isn't a character like Azzam Tamimi pretty well the worst choice the Al-Fauz Institute could have made?

"We'll have other points of view down the road, too," Mirza said.

As for Tamimi's support for the Taliban, Mirza claims that's not so clear. "It's not a blanket defence," Mirza said. And what about Tamimi's grisly advocacy of suicide bombing? Mirza says the subject isn't expected to come up during Tamimi's lectures, which will look back on 1,400 years of Islamic history.

"This is an academic discussion," says Mirza. "We're not trying to get people motivated and inspired like you would at a political rally."

Is the Al-Fauz Institute really interested in helping young Muslim Canadians make healthy contributions to this country's mosaic? Azzam Tamimi preaches a toxic, anti-democratic Islamism and espouses a decidedly oppressive way of life. The Al-Fauz Institute must be called to account -- Canadians deserve to know just what this group has planned.

*We...who watch the current activities of Radical Islam, and the perpetraters and pushers of the poison , known as Shariah Law....are beginning to reach the end of our ropes.
Now...we are not promoting violence, NO, we wouldn't do that.
..................not at this time.....................
But, I for one am getting very close to losing it. Wake up America!! You just read the article from Canada, of all places. Right next door!! Its on our doorstep.
What I am telling everyone and anyone who will listen to me is, its time to take action. Open your mouths!! Send your faxes to your Conressmen!! Pick up the phones. I understand you may be afraid of getting your names out there, but the time is rapidly drawing near.
If we don't do anything now, our children are going to suffer dearly in the future.

Obama - The Apologizer Bunny

2009-07-30T17:52:00.000-07:00

I basically had nothing to do at work when I designed this. I had a few minutes before my boss was coming back, and the image shows the quick job. But I felt that with all the apologizing the new President has been doing, since taking office, we needed something to honor him with. I guess I just have way too much time on my hands.

Jim Feb
- BlackbootJack

Gaza judge tells female lawyers to wear head scarf

2009-07-26T08:02:00.000-07:00

GAZA CITY, Gaza Strip – Gaza's top judge said Sunday that he has ordered female lawyers to wear Muslim headscarves when they appear in court, the latest sign that the Islamic militant group is increasingly imposing its strict interpretation of Islamic law on residents of the coastal strip.

Supreme Court chief justice Abdul-Raouf Halabi said female lawyers will be required to wear a headscarf and a long, dark colored cloak under their billowing black robes when the court returns from its summer recess in September.

Halabi said his order was designed to ensure that women dress in accordance with Islamic law, which requires women to cover up in public, wearing loose garments and only showing their hands and faces.

"Showing a woman's hair is forbidden (in Islam)," the Hamas-appointed Halabi told The Associated Press. "We will not allow people to corrupt morals. This (dress code) will improve work in the courts."

Hamas seized power in Gaza in June 2007 and vowed never to impose its conservative values on others. But it has taken a series of steps in recent months that appear to be aimed at forcing residents to accept its Islamic-oriented social agenda.

Police have pressured store owners to cover scantily clad mannequins, and men relaxing on the beach have been ordered to put more clothes on. One secondary girls' school has made wearing a Muslim headscarf and loose robe a mandatory uniform in the upcoming school year.

The Gaza-based Palestinian Center for Human Rights issued a statement describing the new dress code for female lawyers a "dangerous violation of personal freedoms and women's rights."

The Hamas government formally says it is not imposing Islamic law on the territory's 1.4 million residents. Instead, it says it is simply ensuring that residents behave in line with the territory's own conservative culture.

Most women already wear the headscarf, and life in the Mediterranean strip comes to a complete standstill on Fridays as men gather for communal prayers in mosques.

Subhiya Juma, a female lawyer, said the judge's decision would affect only 10 or so lawyers — since the vast majority of the 150 registered female lawyers already cover their hair.

Juma, who does not wear a headscarf, said the point wasn't the number of women, but that freedoms were being eroded.

"This is dangerous — it's a clear violation of the law, it is taking away our personal freedoms — and by whom? The very person who is meant to defend our freedoms," Juma said.

*
Now ....after reading this, one must conclude that ALL the lawyers are muslim. That is NOT the case. The standards of Islamic law is being thrust upon anyone living in Gaza. There are non-muslim lawyers. They are NOT exempt from wearing the headscarf.
What does that tell us?
Islam does not care if you are muslim or not, as long as you live in an Islamic country, you WILL abide by Islamic law.
Now when muslims come to the United States....they shall abide by American law.
Do they? Most do.
Some do not, and they press other muslims to resist American Constitutional law.

Americans must not be led into a double standard. If we want muslims to abide by our set of law....the same must be in place for Islamic countries. If you live there, you should abide by their set of laws.
Including wearing the hajib. I see journalists wearing them, as did Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
But if a muslim woman wants to free herself of the headscarf...well...in America...she should be able to do so.
Just don't get killed doing so.....
-BBJ

TURMOIL IN TEHRAN

2009-06-20T14:56:00.000-07:00

TEHRAN, Iran – Thousands of protesters defied Iran's highest authority Saturday and marched on waiting security forces that fought back with baton charges, tear gas and water cannons as the crisis over disputed elections lurched into volatile new ground."

Shall we salute and spiritually support the youth movement in Iran, for standing up against a bloodthirsty, corrupt, dictatorship in Iran?

Should Obama let it be known that the US is supporting this said movement?

Would Iran be better off with Musavi, instead of Amadinajhad?

Simple questions, right?

Not necessarily.....the answers are:

YES!

NO!

NO!

Yes, we should give our support and prayers for the students that are marching and fighting in the streets of Tehran. Reports coming in tell of up to 40 people may have been killed. Undocumented reports also state that helicopters may be pouring chemically enhanced agents from the air. Causing a burning sensation if it comes in contact with the flesh. Thank goodness the women are covered from head to toe.

Those youths that have hit the streets have been met with extreme violence form the police and the civilian militias. Baton wheeling thugs storming into buildings and hospitals seem to relish the though of cracking skulls and popping veins.

So, my answer to this question is...Yes. WE should be behind the protestors. Americans stand for liberty and we should support those that truly wish for it.

Second question? My answer is NO!! Obama has been, and should continue to maintain a moderatly neutral stance. His relationship with the current government depends on it. This "uprising" may fizzle out, as many have done before, and Obama will be weaker then he already is. Not to forget the Arab Islamists are a very un-grateful people. Just look at Iraq.

Not to mention that if Obama speaks out in support of the protestors, it will be just another case of Americans "meddling" in foreign affairs.

Better to keep your mouth shut and see what happens, then to play your cards now and end up the loser.

Last question...another resounding NO!!

NO! Iran would not be better if Musavi won over Amadinajhad. Why? Because they are ALL corrupt!!

Don't forget, Musavi was the last Prime Minister in Iran before the constitutional changes which removed the post of prime minister. And it was under Musavi that Iran started its nuclear programs. Like Ahmadinejad, Musavi said Iran will not halt its nuclear work, but suggested he would do more to assure the West it is not for bomb-making. Big freakin deal!!

Besides, its not the Iranian president that holds power, its the Islamic mullahs. And all they care about is the repression of women, and the elimination of Israel and the jewish race.

Iran would not be better off...well OK, maybe a little. But lets not be naive, the chances of the protestors getting what they wish is very slim. Changing regimes is even slimmer. Iran becoming a semi-democracy is non-existent.

So, we can support them, we can pray for them, we can wish them all the luck in the world. But as far as I'm concerned...they're on their own.

BlackbootJack 6/20/09

http://www.blackbootjack.blogspot.com/

An Interview with the Religion of Peace

2009-06-15T14:44:00.000-07:00

Where do you go to get the latest stats on Islamic terror attacks?
Where do you go to get all the resources on Islam?
What is the most quoted web site on the Internet when it comes to Radical Islam?

I managed to steal a little of this mans time to talk to the Infidel Task Force.

Come with us into the mind of the man who runs The Religion of Peace web site.

ITF:
First of all I would like to thank you for taking the time to speak to the viewers of the Infidel Task Force. Your web site, The Religion of Peace, has always been a mainstay in the fight against radical Islam. How did you get the inspiration to create the site?

TROP:

The on-going rate of violence in the name of Islam was an obvious inspiration for TheReligionofPeace.com, but I should also credit the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) with opening my eyes to the reality of this religion.

Even in the aftermath of 9/11, I actually believed that Muslims would lead the battle against Islamic terrorism and root out the extremists. As it turns out, I simply didn’t understand Islam well enough to know that the Muslim world reserves its true outrage for issues that directly affect their religion – such as those involving cartoons and headscarves.

I began watching CAIR closely that September and was astonished by the complete lack of moral perspective with regard to the relatively trivial matters over which the group was soon back to complaining about following the horrific mass murder of 3,000 innocents in the name of Allah. Later, through studying the Qur’an, Hadith and Sira (biography of Muhammad), I came to better understand the narcissism that is deeply rooted in Islam.

ITF:
You have reported on the atrocities of radical Islam for years now. Do you feel it can be a losing battle? Or are people waking up to see what Islam truly is?

TROP:
Ultimately, Islam is its own worst enemy. The more people know about this 7th century desert invention, the more poorly it contrasts with Western liberal values (and common sense).

The success of Islam in the West depends largely on self-censorship and our own willingness to jettison critical thinking when it leads to politically incorrect conclusions. After all, there is a reason why Islam is strictly protected from intellectual dissent in Muslim countries – and it is certainly disappointing that there are some here who want to follow suit.

Still, it is getting harder for these types to deny the dysfunction of the Muslim world, including the widespread problem with devoutly religious terrorists. The challenge is in getting Westerners to see past the ‘multiculturalism barrier’ and recognize that the violence and despotism is ingrained in the legacy of Muhammad.

ITF:
When it comes to the terror attacks by Islamic extremists, why is it that the United Nations remains silent?

TROP:

Because the United Nations isn’t what people think it is.

The romantic fantasy is that the UN is an esteemed body of wise diplomats who gather unselfishly to scratch their beards and determine the common good for the world’s people according to the best intentions of their own citizens.

In actuality, the United Nations is a bloated, massively inefficient and corrupt organization with overpaid staff members and ambassadors who are more likely to be representing the interests of dictators than democracies – each of which count equally when it comes to wielding influence. It is an impotent body with a comical sense of self-importance.

The original ideals of the UN were junked a long time ago (although, to be fair, part of this was because of Cold War politics). Terrorism is not a priority with the organization because it does not serve the political interests of the majority.

ITF:
But when Israel is attacked, the UN seems to have acquired a voice. Why is that?

TROP:
The UN doesn’t acquire its voice unless Israel defends itself following an attack. Again, people have to understand that the organization is not about ideals, but about politics. Israel is a great example.

Since 1967, the UN has clearly thrown in with the Palestinians, pumping in billions of dollars, allowing their resources to be co-opted for military purposes and, of course, famously allowing the Israeli-Palestinian conflict to dominate the Security Council agenda 3 to 1 over anything else happening in the world.

Taking a backseat to the Palestinian conflict – which has cost about 15,000 lives over the course of 60 years – has been the Darfur genocide, for example, in which hundreds of thousands of civilians have died since 2003. There is also the brutal occupation of Tibet by China and the displacement or forced internment of millions there, not to mention the millions of Hindus slaughtered and displaced by armed Muslims in Bangladesh, Pakistan and India.

The UN even sat idly by while 800,000 Rwandan Tutsis were massacred over the course of a few months in 1994 – after pulling its "peacekeepers" out of harms way, of course. The Hutu government conducting the genocide actually sat on the Security Council at the time!

The romanticism may persist, but the United Nations hasn’t been worth taking seriously in a very long time.

ITF:
It has been said, that France is one generation away from Muslim majority. Brussels is at 49% Muslim, and the UK seems to have surrendered to the eventual. What can European countries do to stop the influx of Islam from taking over their countries?

TROP:
In the past, if Europeans wanted to live, then they had to stand and fight. Either this lesson has been forgotten, or they no longer feel that their countries are worth saving.

My feeling is that despite their pride and emphasis on community, many in Europe are deeply selfish and simply unwilling to see past an individual desire for maximum personal comfort. Muslim immigration is ultimately driven by the demand of unrealistic social spending. Although this flawed system will eventually collapse on itself, importing Muslim labor is this generation’s way of pushing off the problems onto the next – even as it compounds them in the process.

Eventually the tipping point will be reached, and it will be too late, even if Europeans were suddenly willing to give up their free ride and take only what they earn in life. It is a sickening betrayal of their ancestors, who fought and died to keep them free from the Islamic threat, but for now, the demographic Jihad will continue unless the continent somehow manages to finds its backbone before it is fully doomed.

ITF:
Then you think it’s too late?

TROP:
For Europe? Probably so. To put it in medical terms, the Islamic virus is in the system and it is replicating much faster than anything else. Meanwhile, the host is conceding tissue and actually finding ways of neutralizing its own self-defense mechanisms (with creative accusations of "racism" and "fascism").

It doesn’t take a crystal ball to see where present trends will lead in Europe.

ITF:
Since 9/11/01, there have been 13342 terror attacks around the world. Do you think the United States is due for another?

TROP:
Future deadly Islamic terror attacks on U.S. soil are a certainty. In fact, there has already been one just this month (in Arkansas).

How soon it will be until another 9/11 may depend on just how serious our current leadership is about making the so-called "rights" of terrorists a higher priority than public safety. It amazes me that we have even reached this point.

ITF:
President Obama recently gave a speech in Cairo to the Muslim world. How effective do you think the speech was? And how do you think the Islamic world will react to that speech?

TROP:
It doesn’t really matter what he says. There is still no place in Islam for infidel to defend themselves against a Muslim enemy. As long as Americans fights back against Islamic terror, they will never have the support of the Muslim world.

As someone else once put it, terrorists are the military wing of mainstream Islam.

ITF:
It has often been said, that the world will end, not with a bang, but with a whimper. Knowing what we know about radical Islam, do you still think that phrase is true?

TROP:
By nature, the majority of people do not think long-term. It’s why poor choices are made in life, concerning finances and even matters more serious, where short-term gratification often rules. The frustration for those of us in the anti-Jihad movement is that we are not simply trying to get people to think long-term, but really long-term - well beyond their lifetime, in fact, to a future in which they may have no personal stake.

Westerners are largely obsessed with their own comfortable lifestyle. This, along with political correctness, makes it even more difficult to convince them that quality of life will deteriorate for future generations if present trends continue and we allow Muslim minorities to grow.

Think of the frog that is cooked in boiling water, because it doesn’t react to the gradual rise in temperature. Look at how this is happening in Europe. In each country, Muslims (collectively) are extremely petulant and demanding. Already, they constitute the most violent segment of the population, according to criminal statistics. Yet, Muslims are still able to convince themselves and others that it is all the fault of their hosts!

Will the Western world end with a whimper or a bang? Since it will be at the hands of Islam, I would predict plenty of both.

ITF:
I know that the viewers reading this are thinking: "What can we do?"
Just what CAN we do to maintain our way of life, and prevent our culture from being taken away from us?

TROP:
I always like to answer this question by first making it clear what shouldn’t be done. No Muslim should be harmed or harassed on account of religion. No property should be vandalized, nor should the Qur’an be desecrated.

The battle against Islam can only be won through truth and education. We must teach ourselves and others what it is about Islam that makes it dangerous. How we speak the truth is almost as important as what we say – so it should be with sensitivity, humility and balance.

ITF:
Once again, let me thank you for chatting with us, and may I speak for everyone when I say, keep up the good work on The Religion of Peace.

2009-04-01T17:49:00.000-07:00

There shall be no law more supreme in America, then the U.S. Constitution!!

April 1, 2017 - The Dearborn Muslim Times -
It was reported this morning that the Dearborn Islamic Citizens Council will be staging a stoning in Geer Park. The accused is a young woman of 22 that had been arrested on adultry. Her lawyer stated that she confessed to the crime and asked for forgiveness. The city Islamic Council stated that only muslims shall be allowed to witness the execution and no video cameras will be allowed.
President Sarah Palin said at her daily press conference that she is powerless to stop the execution.
"The previous administrations Supreme Court ruling allowed the Islamic community to govern their own people under Shariah law, thus superceding the US Constitution. I am sorry, but there is nothing I can do." said Palin.
In 2009 then President Barack Obama, nominated Yale Professor Harold Koh to the US Supreme Court. One of his first victories, after a succesful appointment, was to allow muslims in the Detroit area to establish Shariah law for all those living in the Muslim enclaves.
American civil liberties organizations are up in arms, and stated they will try to stop the execution. Ironically, the ACLU was one of the first groups to support Kohs decision in 2009.
"We never thought it would lead to public executions for something as minor as this. We never gave it a thought." stated ACLU Executive Dorector Anthony D. Romero.

The above article is what some people may think of as food for thought. When I stated that NO law, International or otherwise, shall be placed above the US Constitution, I mean NO law. It has been placed before us, something that may or may never happen. But do we want to sit back and watch, hoping that our laws and our freedoms will stand up to leftist politians and judges that want to change our government to please foreign governments? AT OUR EXPENSE!!
We are the people of the United States of America!!
Nowhere in the world, would you be allowed to bring American laws to another country. Why, for Gods sake, would we allow some other country or religion to change our laws to suit them? If you go to Saudi Arabia, you live under Saudi laws, Islamic laws, Shariah law. You would not be protected by any word of the US Constitution. So why should Islmaic Shariah law be allowed to set foot in the US?
It shouldn't. But if we continue to rest on our laurels, fat, dumb and happy....it will be at our doorstep and in our towns before you know it.
But lets get back to the person in question. A New York lawyer, Steven Stein, says that, in addressing the Yale Club of Greenwich in 2007, Koh claimed that "in an appropriate case, he didn't see any reason why sharia law would not be applied to govern a case in the United States."
I SEE A REASON!!
Shariah is a religious law. It is Islamic law. And as far as I can remember, the first ammendment to the Bill of Rights states:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
If Koh gets his way, score one for the jihadis, negative for the American people.
President Obama has nominated Koh ? until last week the dean of Yale Law School ? to be the State Department?s legal adviser. In that job, Koh would forge a wide range of international agreements on issues from trade to arms control, and help represent our country in such places as the United Nations and the International Court of Justice. That can be a tough job. Imagine going up against some 55 Islamic countries, demanding that muslims living in the US should be allowed to live under their religious law, given to them by
their almighty Allah. Think about it. Koh is a fan of ?transnational legal process,? arguing that the distinctions between US and international law should vanish.
In other words, international law shall govern you and I and we can kiss our Constitution good bye. The very same document our fore-fathers fought a war for Independence and gave their lives to create. And this idiot, is going to trash it.

I have stated numerous times in numerous blogs. If you are going to come to my country, you shall respect the laws of this country. Respect the people you will live next door to. And respect the rights of the citizens that live here. Do not expect the United States to change its laws to suit you. Do not expect the people of this country to change what they have earned, fought for and continue to live under, to suit you. If any immigrant cannot understand that...do not come to this country.
We are a country of laws, of freedom of speech, freedom of expression, and no "international" law shall have supremacy over those laws.
Muslims claim that there is freedom of religion under Shariah. When Islam gains a strong representation in the population, they want to impose Shariah on everyone, since they believe that it is the only law that comes directly from Allah. But it is a false statement. There is no Freedom of Speech in Shariah. There is no Freedom of Religion in Shariah. There is no Democracy under Shariah.
Muslims believe that Shariah is not something the intelligence of man can prove wrong, it is only to be accepted by humans, since it is based on the will of Allah. Muslims see their religion and government being ordained by Allah. It is their conviction that Islam is intended to be the religion of all mankind. It is to be the universal religion to replace Judaism, Christianity, and all others. While Muslims may deny it, they are willing to replace other religions first by conversion, then suppression and even armed conflict. In the Philippines, there is a growing Muslim population that is agitating for the institution of Islamic law. They have not hesitated to use violence to try to implement their beliefs.
Don't think for one minute, that Islamic violence to implement Shariah law in the states will not happen. It will start with small protest groups. Then gain in momentum with American liberal sympathizers. If the local senate does not assist in the implementation, they will take it to the courts. Then WHAM!! you will have Shariah law in your town, and you will wonder what the hell happened!!!
If the courts do not approve it, veiled threats of violence will slip out.
"We will not be able to control our people" said the leader of the Islamic Council.
Once threats of violence is implied, appeasement will take place, "to protect the well being of the citizenry"
It has happened in the UK, don't think it won't happen here.
Both Australia and Canada have had to fend off Islamic attempts to remove Muslim communities from the laws of the land and allow Sharia Law to govern the Muslim population in matters of divorce, marriage, and inheritance. Power grabs in strongly democratic countries has proven to be more of a challenge for Islam and it has regrouped to try again, this time, dropping the words, "Sharia Law" from their submissions for change that would place Islam in control of Muslim communities within democratic countries.In Canada, they have the muslim women to thank for the defeat of a proposed Shariah law system. If muslim women are opposed to Shariah law, how can it be the ideal law for Islamic people?
Because Shariah law favors muslim men!!
There are various petitions going around to stop the implementation of any variation of Shariah law in the US. I encourage all to sign up with them.
September 2009 has been designated Stop Shariah Now month. Find out who your Senator and Congessman is, because you should be communicating your objection to any Shariah proposal.
Encourage your friends to become educated with the subject of creeping Shariah in America.
Talk with your family, friends, work mates. This is not going to go away. If we do nothing, we will have nothing, our children will have nothing.
Join a...or join all...the grassroots campaigns. Act4America, the 9/12 Project, American Congress for Truth, Infidel Task Force, Nemosini, The Paul Revere Brigade. There are many out there.
Its time to take back our country.

Eve of Destruction

2009-03-31T15:58:00.000-07:00

"The eastern world, it is exploding
Violence flarin’, bullets loadin’
You’re old enough to kill, but not for votin’
You don’t believe in war, but what’s that gun you’re totin’
And even the Jordan River has bodies floatin’"

Does anyone remember the old Barry McGuire song? I do. I remember sitting in my bedroom at the age of nineteen, listening to the numbers being called for the draft. The lower the number, the better chance you were going in the Army. Your next destination? Viet Nam. My number was 123.

But that is a story for another day.........

Its 2009, and look at the lyrics. They are as current today as they were in 1969. The only differences, we are closer to the edge then we were back then. Iraq is winding down, Afghanastan is building up.
The Taliban is in Pakistan and being appeased. Its only a matter of time before that country is totally under Taliban control. Pakistan knows it. Taliban knows it. It has just been announced that Obama wants to pursue better relations with "moderate" Taliban. Is there such a thing? maybe he knows something we don't. Perhaps there were moderate Nazis too.
Pakistan has nukes.

The U.N.'s top human-rights body approved a proposal backed by Muslims nations Thursday urging the passage of laws around the world protecting religion from criticism. How did this happen? Simple. The Human Rights council is dominated by Muslim and African countries. The western nations opposed the measure while 13 countries abstained. Thirteen. Muslim nations have stated that religion, Islam in particular, must be shielded from any criticism whatsoever. The Danish cartoons were sighted specifically. They said those that depicted Mohammed in a bad image was unacceptable. UNACCEPTABLE? What about the right of expression and Freedom of Speech in Democracy. Here it is people....Islam is not consistent with Democracy.
It is the individual that has rights, not religion.

The Obama administration has recently declared all previous administration terrorist wording to be obsolete. Now it is "man-caused disasters" for terrorist attacks. Does this now mean we are a safer country? Well...we haven't been attacked in almost nine years, so what is that attributed to?
Now.....I have nothing against Obama. He has been in power for only 60 days, lets give him a chance. But if he has people under him changing the rhetoric of communication, I do feel he will have a difficult time.

The southern border is a keg of dynamite. Hezbollah is coming through the channels set up by the drug cartels. Its been documented and proven. Hezbollah is in the US.
The Muslim Brotherhood has terrorist training camps all across the country. Its documented and proven.
A Kuwaiti Professor gives a videoed speech advocating the destruction of the US. Whether thru explosives or Anthrax. Your very welcome for for letting us liberate your country from Saddam.

Who the hell ever heard of Shariah law ten years ago? Now...the UK has the start of it. That start, gives muslims all the encouragement needed to push for more and more. Its called appeasement. It didn't work with the Nazis in WW2, it won't work today. Islam will get whatever it desires and laugh in your face. Most muslims keep telling me, radicals are a minority in Islam.
Nazis were a minority in Germany.
Mugabe came to power in Zimbabwe with a minority.
Iran became an Islamic country with a minority.
Saddam held power with a minority

All it takes is a certain few, and if the majority says nothing, the radical few will succeed.

So...are we are the Eve of Destruction?
There will be another terrorist attack in the US. Its only a matter of time. How will that change us? Right now we are back in the 9/10 mindset.
We need to be in 9/12.

CAIR’s Well-Deserved Expulsion

2009-03-29T09:26:00.000-07:00

Terrorism is only one expression of jihad — there are others as dangerous. A week ago, the FBI officially announced that it has cut ties with the Council on American-Islamic Relations. The self-styled civil rights organization is characteristically squawking, but the FBI’s move was patently overdue — so much so that we ought to be asking: Why on earth did the FBI have ties with CAIR in the first place? While we should applaud the government for finally doing the right thing, we also must seize this moment to consider why this action was necessary, and what it says about the threat we are up against. That threat is not, essentially, about terrorism. Given the life-and-death stakes involved, it is understandable that government is preoccupied by terrorism (or what Obama’s homeland security secretary, Janet Napolitano, absurdly calls “man-caused disasters”). But jihadist terror is merely the means to a specific end: the installation of sharia, the Islamic legal code, which Muslim fundamentalists regard as the necessary precondition for the achievement of Islam’s universalist ambitions. Sharia should be of grave concern to us because it is antithetical to the U.S. Constitution and to our way of life. It rejects several core American propositions: that liberty cannot co-exist with an established state religion, that free people have a right to govern themselves irrespective of any religious code’s dictates, that there should be freedom of conscience (sharia holds that apostasy from Islam is not merely a crime but a capital offense), sexual liberty (homosexuality is also a death-penalty offense), and equal protection under the law (sharia privileges Muslims over non-Muslims and men over women). Sharia, furthermore, is the rationale commonly trotted out by militants to justify the use of force (whether we call it “terrorism” or employ such sophistries as “resistance” or “man-caused disasters”) for resolving policy disputes — under the rationale that policies that do not privilege Islam constitute an attack on Islam and therefore justify jihadist violence. Incrementally establishing sharia is the central imperative of CAIR and several other organizations to which our government has recklessly been reaching out for years, since long before the 9/11 attacks. In sum, administrations of both parties, and executive branch agencies including the FBI, have taken the position that government’s only legitimate concern is the comparatively tiny cohort of terrorists who construe Islamic scriptures to command mass-murder attacks. Not only have we averted our eyes from the ideology that motivates jihadism. We have affirmatively anointed as Muslim “moderates” the purveyors of this ideology, who are anything but moderate. Worse, the effect has been to empower anti-American elements at the expense of authentic Muslim moderates and reformers who crave liberty. CAIR is an outgrowth of the Muslim Brotherhood, an Egyptian organization founded in 1928 that today boasts divisions throughout the world. The Brotherhood has been operating in the United States since the 1960s in a manner fully consistent with its motto: “Allah is our objective. The Prophet is our leader. The Quran is our law. Jihad is our way. Dying in the way of Allah is our highest hope.” Its website makes no bones about the fact that it seeks “the introduction of the Islamic Shariah as the basis for controlling the affairs of state and society.” Last year, the government won convictions in a terrorism-financing trial that targeted an ostensible Islamic charity, the Holy Land Foundation, along with several of its top operatives. CAIR has complained long and loud because prosecutors identified it as an unindicted co-conspirator in the case. Its argument that this was a smear is specious. The issue is not whether the government named CAIR on a list disseminated pretrial; what’s germane is the basis for that listing. The government richly supported its assertion with evidence, and no citizen or organization has a right to expunge that which is proved in the public’s courts. At trial, the jury was treated to a 1991 Brotherhood memorandum that described the organization’s “work in America” as “a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers, so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.” CAIR has been the linchpin of that strategy. Some history is in order. In 1987, the Brotherhood had established Hamas (or “the Islamic Resistance Movement,” as it describes itself). As its charter professes, Hamas
is one of the wings of Muslim Brotherhood in Palestine. Muslim Brotherhood Movement is a universal organization which constitutes the largest Islamic movement in modern times. It is characterized by its deep understanding, accurate comprehension and its complete embrace of all Islamic concepts of all aspects of life, culture, creed, politics, economics, education, society, justice and judgment, the spreading of Islam, education, art, information, science of the occult and conversion to Islam. In a memorandum filed in a Texas federal court, prosecutors further elaborated that, through the early 1990s, “the Muslim Brotherhood was controlled by Palestinian Muslim Brotherhood members, and the leader of the U.S.-Muslim Brotherhood was Mousa Abu Marzook, who in 1989 was selected to be the leader of HAMAS, a position that he held while residing in the United States and controlling the U.S.-Muslim Brotherhood.” To support Hamas, the Brotherhood established a “Palestine Committee” in the United States. Marzook (deported in 1995, he is currently wanted on a U.S. terrorism indictment in Chicago) led the Palestine Committee. One of its most important members was Omar Ahmad, who became president of the Islamic Association for Palestine (IAP), which Marzook had formed years earlier. In 1993, the Palestine Committee convened a meeting in Philadelphia to plot a strategy for destroying the Oslo Accords’ vision of a two-state solution — Palestine peacefully co-existing with Israel, which Hamas is pledged to destroy. The meeting was secretly surveilled by the FBI, which caught Ahmad conversing with Nihad Awad, the IAP’s public-relations director, about strategies for deceiving Americans about their true intentions. Less than a year later, Ahmad and Awad formed CAIR. The Holy Land Foundation, which was ultimately shuttered by the government and finally convicted for providing millions of dollars to Hamas, contributed part of the seed money. To serve as CAIR’s communications director, Ahmad and Awad tapped Ibrahim Hooper, another IAP veteran who has publicly acknowledged that his purpose is to establish sharia as the law of the United States. Since its founding, several CAIR officials have been convicted or deported for terrorism-related activities and for other criminal offenses. CAIR, meanwhile, has sought to undermine national security — and the FBI specifically — at every turn: frequently mounting public-relations campaigns for indicted terror suspects, vigorously opposing the Patriot Act and the surveillance of suspected al-Qaeda communications, and even distributing a “Muslim community safety kit” that discourages cooperation with the FBI. Despite that sordid record, government officials regarded CAIR as a representative and leader of American Muslims. Our law-enforcement and national-security agencies consulted with it closely and even permitted it to indoctrinate our agents during compulsory “sensitivity training” lectures. Doing so, they raised its profile, facilitated its radical, anti-American agenda, and dispirited our allies in the Muslim community, many of whom are in the United States precisely because they don’t want to live in the totalitarian misery the Muslim Brotherhood and its satellites would impose. The major threat we face today is not what al-Qaeda may do to the grand structures that house our government and our institutions. It is what radical Islam is accomplishing inside those structures. Thankfully, the FBI has shown CAIR the door. But that only begins to address the problem.

Citizens' Declaration and Plea for Relief

2009-03-14T12:56:00.000-07:00

Citizens' Declaration and Plea for Relief
Posted by Civilus Defendus

September 2009 has been designated Stop Shariah Month
The Declaration below will be a cornerstone in the project. I recommend everyone read it. Then go and sign the petition. Stand with us. We must support each other, before its too late!

We citizens of the United States of America, in order to preserve for posterity the foundation of liberty bestowed upon us by our founding fathers through our Constitution, do recognize the United States to be under grave threat of invasion, domestic violence and insurrection from elements within Islam. We respectfully declare the causes which lead to this belief and register our plea for relief.

We declare:Islam is both theological and political in nature, as revealed in generally accepted renditions of the Quran, Sira, Hadith and Islamic law known as Sharia, whose expressed ambition is to bring the world into a state of submission to ‘Allah’ and divine (Sharia) law;

Core tenets of Islam are irreconcilably in conflict with the United States Constitution, identified in part as infringements upon freedom of religion and expression, lack of equality among people and between the sexes, and sanctioned deception in dealing with non-Muslims; these precepts constitute a breach of inalienable human rights;

Political Islam’s supremacism represents a duality of existence, placing Muslims superior to non-Muslims, and endorses behaviors that can debase, harm or kill non-Muslims;

History is replete with examples of the aggressive and violent expansion of Islam across Africa into Europe and across the Middle East into Europe and Asia, offering an invitation to Islam, subjugation under Islam with inferior class status, or jihad war;

Current events are filled with examples of the Islamic expansion and imperialism through violent and covert jihad, including Kosovo, India, Kashmir, Malaysia, Philippines, Sudan, Kenya, Israel, United Kingdom, France, Algeria, Morocco and others;

The attacks of September 11, 2001 upon the United States, its financial institutions, its people and traditions were claimed by people as jihad in defense of Islam, to spread Islam and to subjugate, obliterate, or otherwise defeat the United States;

Sharia finance has been shown to fund jihad against the United States and the West;

Many followers of Islam through words and deeds encourage insurrection and incite violence toward United States to subjugate it and replace the Constitution with Islamic rule;
and....

Many more silently endorse or use intimidation to support armed or covert jihad, thereby providing aid and comfort to our avowed enemies during these times of domestic and international strife.

Now Therefore We the People ……
...appeal to the President, Congress, and Supreme Court for relief from these dangers and to defend the people of the United States, our traditions and legal underpinnings from threats posed by political Islam, its leaders, its followers, or any other aligned force. We state that any nation so threatened from within or without has the responsibility, obligation and right to defend itself and its people from aggressors. This declaration and plea are deemed legitimate demands upon our government; Article IV, Section 4, of the Constitution requires the United States to protect each state against threat of Invasion and domestic Violence. Continued accommodation, appeasement and hopeful assimilation constitute surrender to a totalitarian ideology. The duty rests upon this generation to defend this nation for ourselves and posterity. We cannot allow liberty borne of more than 2,000 years of civil development to be vanquished.

Plea for Relief:
1. That political Islam and Sharia law be officially recognized by the federal government as threats to the United States, the Constitution, and American culture and institutions.

2. That Title 18 USC “Chapter 115: Treason, Sedition and Subversive Activities,” including incarceration, deportation or execution, be fully utilized as duly appropriate for advancing Sharia law, advocating or acting to implement jihad or other acts detrimental to security.

3. That Department of State programs, policies, training and relationships be evaluated for their compatibility with national security, and amended accordingly.

4. That foreign aid to Islamic nations cease and aid to nations influenced by Islam be severely curtailed, except to resist jihad.

5. That participation in the UN be reassessed based on human rights, security and relevancy.

6. That the courts and law enforcement be trained to recognize Sharia law, Muslim Brotherhood activities and the manifestations of jihad; and that jihad crime statistics made available.

7. That immigration reforms immediately be implemented to include a suspension of immigration by Muslims for not less than 20 years, exclusive of apostates seeking asylum.

8. That all prospective immigrants be characterized for their compatibility with the United States Constitution and be required to pledge an oath of allegiance, with violators deported.

9. That visa applicants be rejected for seditious history, or intent or association with jihad and that any foreign visitors exhibiting seditious behavior be arrested and/or deported.

10. That no Sharia-compliant finance be adopted for any government financing; that any private financial institutions must fully disclose any Sharia-compliant activities.

11. That our borders be secured by means of physical barriers, patrols and military actions as necessary to repulse illegal entrants.

12. That the legacy of jihad be subject to critical analysis in civil and military education.

13. That no foreign influence or advocacy be tolerated in public school textbooks or materials.

14. That no foreign ownership be allowed of any media that purports to provide news services.

15. That no public monies or services shall be dispensed to encourage social separation in courts, schools, hospitals or other public or private places.

16. That any mosque violating its religious standing be reclassified as political in nature and subject to tax laws and if deemed appropriate other civil and criminal laws.

17. That any mosque found to engage in political organizing, allow or encourage incitement to violence, subversion or jihad be closed for not less than 2 years, and permanently for a second such finding.

18. That no additional mosques be allowed until Islamic countries reciprocate in international relations, freedom of religion and houses of worship, and social equality.We cannot accommodate hostile customs, tolerate unconstitutional behavior nor appease our adversaries without losing what it means to be American.

Civilus Defendus, 2009

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/citizens-declaration-of-threat-ple...

Citizens' Declaration of Threat & Plea for Relief - The Petition Site

2009-03-14T12:43:00.000-07:00

Citizens' Declaration of Threat & Plea for Relief - The Petition Site

Islam and Democracy

2009-03-03T16:20:00.000-08:00

Oil and Water.
Oil and water don’t mix. No matter how you shake, stir, tumble, whatever….oil and water will not mix. Eventually they will separate. They will go their own ways.
Another thing about the oil and water saga, is that one is flammable, and if you have enough, it can be downright explosive.
What am I getting at?
I use the oil/water analogy, because it illustrates our topic of Islam and Democracy. Islam does not combine with Democracy. It will never blend with Democracy, and if you have enough islamics, it will get explosive. See the picture? We can shake, and stir and do everything in our power and Islam will never mate with Democracy.
For starters, lets take a quick look at Iraq. The United States is now charged by the world to "rebuild" Iraq. In its 5,000-year history, Iraqis have never played any role in the governance of their nation, and the past three decades of ruthless and barbaric rule by Saddam Hussein have not prepared them for this task. The United States may get the electricity going in Iraq and repair its water and sewage systems, but whether it can get Iraqis to adopt a constitutionally based democratic government will prove a difficult, if not impossible, task. Iraqis today, have never experienced Democracy. In this case, its not because of their imams telling their flock, “Democracy is Evil!!”, its because they have been under the decades rule of dictatorships.
"Give Me Liberty Or Give Me Death"
Patrick Henry, March 23, 1775.

Among Muslims, only the Turks have experienced any form of self-rule and that was due to a remarkable man, Ataturk, who literally forced them to accept westernization. In doing so, he imposed a strict divide between Islam and the governing of Turkey. This has been maintained only because the Turkish military has judiciously stepped in time and again to crush any Islamist party seeking to impose the Islam’s system of rule. But the Islamics are still trying, and getting closer .. Its only a matter of time, that even Turkey will fall to the Islamic rule.
Democracy…as we know it, and the “religion” of Islam are totally incompatible. (Oil and water, remember?) Only the separation of church and state, only the rule of civil law can grant Muslims--the vast majority of whom, I’m sure, are good, decent people--the freedom they want and many Muslims, such as those in Iran, do want it. If you doubt it, look at the media. They tell the tales of girls wishing to look like western women. The hajib falling slightly back to show long brown hair and eye make-up is becoming the norm.
The laws of Islam, considered sacred and inviolable, clash with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948), and those expressed in both the British (1688) and American Bill of Rights (1791). To cite just a few reasons why Islam and democracy are incompatible; under Islam, women and non-Muslims are declared to be inferior, slavery is acceptable, punishments for various crimes include amputations, floggings, and stoning to death, a non-Muslim cannot testify against a Muslim, and conversion from Islam carries with it the death penalty. I’m not kidding!! Elements of this religious severity can be seen in Saudi Arabia. Life means little to these rulers, and the lives of non-muslims mean even less.
“The greatest threat to America, the West, and to those Islamic nations struggling to achieve democracy and freedom is Islam.” - Alan Caruba
There is no separation of church and state under Islam, and there never can be for any Muslim who accepts the Koran and the Hadith as the sacred rule of law. To suggest otherwise imperils their belief in the Koran as the word of Allah as passed to them by Muhammad, his self-appointed "final" prophet. In Muslim nations where so-called secular, i.e. socialist governments such as the former Baath Party of Iraq and the current one in Syria exist, the reality is that these nations are run by despots and their governments are mere rubber stamps. In others, such as Saudi Arabia, a self-declared royal family rules. In nations such as Iran, where a secular government is allowed to function, a supreme council of ayatollahs can and does routinely overrule any legislative act, thus rendering democratic rule moot. Islam never allows the possibility of alternatives, so the concept of debating political issues is foreign to Islamic thought. (Once again…back to my oil and water analogy)
Are you getting the point?
Freedom is about individual rights granted a citizen that governments may not trespass, nor deprive, and individualism is not a recognizable feature of Islam; instead, the collective will of the Muslim people is constantly emphasized. There is certainly no notion of individual rights, which only developed in the West, especially during the eighteenth century. The notion of an individual--a moral person who is capable of making rational decisions and accepting moral responsibility for his free acts--is lacking in Islam. Ethics is reduced to obeying orders, If that statement reminds you of the Star Trek Borgs….you’re catching on.
The most important lesson we should learn is that democracy is a combination of two distinct political traditions: popular sovereignty, in which the people choose the government in free and fair elections; and liberty – that is, freedom – which comes in religious, economic, and political forms. My favorite is Freedom of Speech. The practice of popular sovereignty without the safeguards of liberty, history shows, can have disastrous results.
Michael Mandelbaum has stated in his outline that “The United States should therefore oppose groups that reject liberty, such as Hamas, and should give higher priority in the Middle East to establishing liberty in its different forms than simply to staging elections.”
Very wise comment and one that should be headed by the Obama administration.
Looking at it from another angle… lets take a pretend Islamic country on the verge of democracy. Democracy has driven out Islam from national life. Islamic sovereignty has been replaced by the people’s sovereignty. If the people hold sovereignty, then almost all of Islamic law is useless. Then people say, “Don’t bring Islamic law into national life,” and, “Why must the state handle religion, it’s a private matter?’.
Secondly, democracy states that truth lies with the majority. Whatever the majority says is correct. In Islam truth comes from Allah. There is no question in Islam, everything comes from Allah.
There are 56 (give or take a few, depending on what day it is) Islamic countries. How many of them are total Democracies? How many of those Islamic countries, let the everyday muslim live his or her life? How many have Freedom of Religion? Open media? Respect womens rights?
If you answered none…….you would be correct. There are a few that pass as democratic Islamic regimes, but don’t let them fool you. Try to set up a Catholic church there and see how far you get. Try to remove your wifes hajib and watch the religious police come up to chat with you.
Granted in some countries, they need dictatorships. Like most Islamic countries, they are revered. Venezuala is going down that same road. If the citizens vote in a dictator, they deserve it. If the citizens vote in a terrorist government, like Hamas, they deserve it.
As for me.....Give me the Liberty and the Freedoms that the United States of America have placed before us.
- BlackbootJack -

The Infidel Task Force

2009-02-16T10:30:00.000-08:00

Three years ago this April, something happened on Youtube. A few members got sick and tired of seeing Islamic Jihadis posting violent videos for everybody to view. Muslims were flagging anti-radical islamic videos, democratic and patriotic videos. Flagging and leaving hateful remarks on anti-islamic videos, just got to be too much.
A few Youtube members met on a video with the re-known ex-muslim woman named Wafa Sultan. A very elequent and forceful woman told the truth about Islam, and the muslims didn't want to hear it. A verbal diatribe and debate started between hateful muslims and "non-believers"...to be known as The Infidel Task Force.
These few Infidels banded together and met frequently on this video. Very soon, word went around that the Infidels were gaining in popularity and new members were brought on board.

Now...they weren't the only anti-islamic group on Youtube. The Templars and The Crusaders were also roaming the video web sites. As far as we know today, only the ITF remains active and viable.

A meeting place was set up for the new team to meet and stratigize, hence to be known as "the bunker". Very soon, multiple channels appeared. Infidels 1001, Infidels 2001...2009...2010..InfidelTaskForce...InfidelsTribute (hosting the Geet Wilders video Fitna)
Members started making their own videos, and uploading to the sites. A Theology Dept was born, an advisory board, recruitment dept. And just recently, a media team was formed to communicate with the outside world personalities, like Michael Savage, Glenn Beck, Michelle Malkin, Brigitte Gabriel to name a few. That team became known as COMA2009 (Center of Media Activities)

Almost three years, and now this team of 52 strong members have set up their own web site. A window to the outside world, beyond Youtube.

The mission is not over. Membership is continuing to grow. The word is getting out that the ITF is alive and working. With the threat of radical islam, and creeping shariah worldwide, the ITF mission is to expose islam for the evil it really is. To radical islam, the Infidel Task Force is a stumbling block on their road to power, and one that will never go away.

Pay them a visit:
http://infideltaskforce.webs.com/index.htm

Another Taliban Killing

2009-02-08T17:01:00.000-08:00

Taliban release video of beheading
From correspondents in Peshawar
Agence France-Presse
February 09, 2009 07:03am

PAKISTANI Taliban militants released a graphic video on Sunday showing the beheading of a Polish engineer whom they said was killed because Islamabad refused to free detained insurgents.
The tape, seen by an AFP correspondent here, was released one day after a spokesman for Pakistan's umbrella Taliban group said its men had decapitated Piotr Stanczak, who was kidnapped in the volatile northwest on September 28.
Stanczak, who was working in Pakistan for a Polish energy company, was seized by armed men in the town of Attock, about 70km northwest of the capital Islamabad. His two drivers and bodyguard were killed.
Polish deputy foreign minister Jacek Najder earlier said authorities in Warsaw were still awaiting official confirmation of Stanczak's killing by Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP).
Prime Minister Donald Tusk previously said Poland had received "informal confirmation" of the engineer's death, while a spokesman for the Polish embassy in Islamabad said it considered the TTP claim to be "99.99 per cent true".
The video shows Stanczak sitting cross-legged on a carpet, wearing a khaki shalwar kameez. He made a brief statement in English in response to questions posed by his captors, urging his government to withdraw its contingent of about 1100 troops from Afghanistan.
In the next scene, Stanczak is sitting in the same position, but blindfolded. A masked man is shown beheading him with a knife, while two men stand guard behind him, holding AK-47s at the hostage's head.
A masked militant is then shown saying Stanczak was killed because Taliban prisoners were not released and warning that other foreign hostages could meet the same fate, without claiming to have specific hostages in captivity.

__________________________________________________________________________________

So what have we learned from this? Another sensless slaughter by the local Islamic butchers, the Taliban. Where is the outcry from the muslim population?
You will not hear one...why? Because they:
A) Don't care.
B) The murdered man was not a muslim, so hence they don't care.

BUT...name a teddy bear Mohammed, and you have them marching in the streets, shouting, "Death To America!!"
Sick isn't it?
If anybody in the world, thinks that Radical Islamics will stay in the third world and leave the West alone, should think again. They are coming. It won't be tommorrow, or next week....but they are coming.
Be afraid...be very afraid.

On the Brink of Insanity

2009-01-27T14:13:00.000-08:00

Riots in Bahrain after 3 Shiite activists charged AP - 57 minutes ago 1/27/09
MANAMA, Bahrain - Police fired tear gas at dozens of rioters in Bahrain on Tuesday as the public prosecutor charged three Shiite Muslim activists with promoting a coup.

And now...it hits Bahrain. Islamic facism continues to spread its terror throughout the world. It will not stop. It will continue, until people say ENOUGH! What is it going to take, to get through to people of the world, that these facists want us dead? They want our families DEAD! That want our Democracy DEAD! Islamo-Facists of the world hate us and everything we stand for. Its time to wake up.

Iranian Kurd guilty of setting fire to Iranian embassy in London AFP - 38 minutes ago
LONDON (AFP) - An Iranian Kurd who sought asylum in Britain was handed a 50-week suspended jail sentence Tuesday for trying to burn down the Iranian embassy in London.

Amazing! I would have given that man a medal and a position in Parliment. Look at the sentence:
50 week SUSPENDED !

Obama tells Arabic network US is 'not your enemy' AP - Tue Jan 27, 2:19 PM ET
CAIRO, Egypt - President Barack Obama chose an Arabic satellite TV network for his first formal television interview as president, part of a concerted effort to repair relations with the Muslim world that were damaged under the previous administration.

I bet that will get them to stop bombing our embassies.

I can go on and on and on. Every day I read something that just takes my breath away. I am shocked, to say the least of what I read in the media. What I see on the news.

The Washington-DC based human rights group, International Christian Concern (ICC) www.persecution.org has just learned that six unidentified men went on a robbing spree in a rural village in Pakistan on the night of January 10, and when they realized that one of the households they were robbing was Christian, they gang-raped a 14-year-old girl in front of her parents to violate their faith. What kind of perverted sons of bitches would do something so evil?

Police in Atlanta have been investigating the death of a 25-year-old Pakistani woman, who was allegedly murdered by her father in the name of family honor.
She wanted out of an arranged marriage, but her father thought a divorce would bring shame to the family. This is an "honor killing". What kind of person puts his faith before the lives of his children. Honor killings are on the rise, even now...in the United States. How does one stop something so evil as this?

Bombs strapped to children.
Innocents blown out of the sky.
Hamas uses human shields.
Children raised as cannon fodder.
Protestors yell"Jews go back to the ovens" And they get away with it.

Islamic facism is on the rise.
While America sleeps.

It cannot be denied. We are on the brink of insanity.

Remember Mumbai

2009-01-23T15:49:00.000-08:00

What we have witnessed in India, is the true face of islam. The hatred and terror shown by radical Muslims, shows that they will not be satisfied until democracy and the free world is either exterminated, or under their total control.And by having so many Muslims celebrate this tragedy, shows that hatred in Islam runs very deep.There is no excuse, there is no viable reason, for such actions.
The only real solution will be diplomacy. When the Islamic world comes to term, and realizes that talks will be the only way to recover there "dignity", then they will stop the radicals from speaking for the entire Islamic world.There is no excuse available today. 150 some odd people are dead. Americans, Brits, and Jews were singled out. What does that tell us? They were out for blood. there is no reason for this to happen. Islam is should hang its head in shame.
Today is not the day to sympathize with any Islamic cause. Those days are over.
Frustrated or not, it doesn't give them the right to storm buildings and pick out Americans, Brits, and Jews. There is no excuse, no reason, except to exterminate us. ALL Muslims should be ashamed of what they condone in India. Things like this only feed the hatred the world feels towards Islam and apathetic Muslims. The terrorists that killed over 125 people are following the real Islam. Muslims can make all the excuses they want, but now, they should hang their heads in shame.
Too many innocents died because of gunfire ripping through their bodies. Men, women, children. All dead.There is no excuse today.
Too many times, Muslims have endorsed this barbaric behavior. Its time THEY make it stop. The spiral of violence is out of control. Muslims remind us constantly, to remember past anti-Islamic tragedies. Until they can come to grips with their constant and repulsive way to get attention, the world will say those past anti-Islamic actions are now justified.
The killing must stop, and the key must be turned by the Muslim. If they cannot accept that, if they cannot accept that diplomacy is the only solution, terror from both sides will continue.But today...there is no excuse.

150 people are dead, men, women , children.

Who Speaks for the Muslim?

2009-01-23T14:14:00.000-08:00

The common muslim is in trouble. He speaks NOT for himself, because he cannot.The radical immams calling for jihad, the radical islamic fascist terrorists calling for jihad , and the radical islamic leaders, ALL calling for jihad, speak for the common muslim. They are your spokespeople, they are your mouthpieces, THEY speak for islam, THEY speak for the muslim.Muslims today have never had to defend their religion, now they do.
And they are scared.

The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.[Edmund Burke]

Our lives begin to end, the day we become silent about things that matter.[Martin Luther King]

When the majority of the people become like sheep and will tolerate intolerance rather than make a fuss, then there is no limit to how far any group will go.[Thomas Sowell]